William L. Thomson Jr. napsal(a):
> On Sat, 2006-12-23 at 20:20 +0100, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
>> I had some talks w/ tomcat folks
>
> Where? Who? Just curious.
There, you'll love it :P
http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=users%40tomcat.apache.org&q=tomcat+commercial+crap
--
Best regards,
J
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
Could anyone explain where all these dependencies come from ?
Are there perhaps some build conditionals which are not yet
reflected in useflags ?
Use emerge -t option to see where things come from. I think axis came
from mx4j which was recently split to two ebuilds mx4j-
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 01:42:40AM -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> This testing period will last for 2-4 weeks, depending on how stable the
> setup of bugstest turns out to be. Then we can hopefully roll out the
> new Bugzilla for production use in time for Christmas!
Hi Everybody,
I'd like to a
On Sun, 2006-12-24 at 09:53 +0100, Jakub Moc wrote:
> William L. Thomson Jr. napsal(a):
> > On Sat, 2006-12-23 at 20:20 +0100, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> >> I had some talks w/ tomcat folks
> >
> > Where? Who? Just curious.
>
> There, you'll love it :P
>
> http://www.mail-archive.com/search?l=user
For those that just can't get enough around the holidays.
On Sun, 2006-12-24 at 10:11 -0500, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-12-24 at 09:53 +0100, Jakub Moc wrote:
> > William L. Thomson Jr. napsal(a):
> > > On Sat, 2006-12-23 at 20:20 +0100, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> > >> I had some ta
Robin H. Johnson wrote:
On Thu, Nov 16, 2006 at 01:42:40AM -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
This testing period will last for 2-4 weeks, depending on how stable the
setup of bugstest turns out to be. Then we can hopefully roll out the
new Bugzilla for production use in time for Christmas!
> If everyone's Login ID is their email address, may I suggest changing
> 'Login:' to 'E-mail:'? I usually try 2 or 3 wrong ID's before recalling
> that my ID is my email address.
Although I save my passwords in kde wallet it sounds good for me.
--
Best Regards,
Piotr Jaroszyński
--
gentoo-dev
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 21:22:54 +0100
"Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wonder if with ACCEPT_LICENSES it would be possible to get a way to
> represent this issue, like a "unredistributable" fake license,
> disabled during GRP building for instance, so that the packages
> ne
Stephen Bennett wrote:
Obviously though that doesn't work in the more general case where said
linkage is not based on an optional dep, so something better would be
useful. I'm not sure LICENSE is the right way forward here -- it would
How bout using RESTRICT? RESTRIC="bindist" or something, fo
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 21:56:54 +0100
"Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> GPL-2:
> Note: this license states that the software is licensed under GNU
> General Public License version 2, and you might not be able to
> consider it licensed under any later version.
>
> GPL-2+:
> Not
On Sun, 24 Dec 2006 18:51:24 +0100
Vlastimil Babka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> How bout using RESTRICT? RESTRIC="bindist" or something, for the
> unconditional violations?
RESTRICT does not at present affect visibility of packages. I'd like to
keep it that way.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing
# Charlie Shepherd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (24 Dec 2006)
# Mask pending removal 24 Jan - dead upstream, fails to compile
# with later kernels, see bug 153365
media-video/dxr2-driver
I don't think anyone uses this - it fails to compile on any decent
kernel and was only reported by Patrick after his ti
On Sun, Dec 24, 2006 at 09:39:20AM -0600, Mike Bonar wrote:
> If everyone's Login ID is their email address, may I suggest changing
> 'Login:' to 'E-mail:'? I usually try 2 or 3 wrong ID's before recalling
> that my ID is my email address.
Done.
--
Robin Hugh Johnson
E-Mail : [EMAIL PROTEC
* Tiziano Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
Hi,
> >since jakub (as always) closes all my bugs, I'll report the issue
> >to this list before completely giving up and never ever waste a
> >single second on reporting bugs ...
> ... and we're grateful to you for that.
For reporting this issue o
* Enrico Weigelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> I'd prefer the a) and so attached an fixed ebuild for 8.0.8.
Forgot the attachement. Here it is ...
This ebuild adds pg_config to libpq-8.0.8, gave it version -r1.
Tested it @ x86.
cu
--
--
Enrico Weigelt napsal(a):
> * Enrico Weigelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>
>> I'd prefer the a) and so attached an fixed ebuild for 8.0.8.
>
> Forgot the attachement. Here it is ...
>
> This ebuild adds pg_config to libpq-8.0.8, gave it version -r1.
> Tested it @ x86.
Don't want to be rude, bu
* William L. Thomson Jr. <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
Hi,
> > Great :)
> > It was really, really ugly getting tomcat emerge'd w/ all this
> > commercial crap :(
>
> Blame upstream for using them. Granted the are somewhat optional
> more on that below.
Well, they told me, I won't need them ...
* Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Don't want to be rude, but would you damn read the bug finally?
> It's already *fixed* in ~arch and waiting for stabilization
> (in fact, it's already stabilized almost everywhere due to
> security Bug 152783).
As far as the official (not-cvs) tree c
* Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> On Saturday 23 December 2006 22:35, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> > I'm not an license expert
> Then shut up.
>
> You're wrong, it's true for dynamic linking as well as for
> static linking.
I don't understand that. Please give some help.
Th
On Sunday 24 December 2006 19:17, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> I don't understand that.
go do some reading from the fsf then
we dont want this crap on the mailing list
-mike
pgp6zCZX0t1Oy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Mon, 2006-12-25 at 00:15 +0100, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
>
> Well, they told me, I won't need them ... who the hell's right ?
Your asking users questions you should be asking the Tomcat developers.
Most all Tomcat users never ever even get close to compiling Tomcat.
Either ask the developers, or d
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
* Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
Don't want to be rude, but would you damn read the bug finally?
It's already *fixed* in ~arch and waiting for stabilization
(in fact, it's already stabilized almost everywhere due to
security Bug 152783).
As far as the official
On Sunday 24 December 2006 22:54, Doug Goldstein wrote:
> Do you read ANYTHING? It's a security bug... PREVIOUS VERSIONS WILL NOT
> BE FIXED! Since they're affected by a security issue.
i miss the happier times when we had him banned
-mike
pgph1UeC06cSE.pgp
Description: PGP signature
Mike Frysinger wrote:
i miss the happier times when we had him banned
Do you think it's time for a revival?
lu
--
Luca Barbato
Gentoo/linux Gentoo/PPC
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_zero
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
Luca Barbato wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
i miss the happier times when we had him banned
Do you think it's time for a revival?
lu
We never banned him, actually.
-Alec Warner
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
25 matches
Mail list logo
