Yuri Vasilevski wrote:
[...]
> But at the benefit of having less confusion
> for users about "What the heck is a GPL-2+?" for at last the same period
> of time.
[...]
> So users will have to check what's the
> meaning of that + at the end of GPL-2+, so I think it'll create much
> more confusion tha
Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> net-misc/ltsp will be removed on 15 Jan 2007, it has been hard masked
> today. There is no maintainer, we have an open security issue [1], so it
> will be punted. If someone steps to take it over, you know what to do.
>
> [1] http://bugs.gentoo.org/
On Sat, 23 Dec 2006 00:01:23 + (UTC)
Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrew Gaffney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Fri, 22 Dec 2006
> 17:08:45 -0600:
>
> > Roy Marples wrote:
> >> Hi list.
> >>
> >> Not often I issue a last rites, but here we go!
> >
Hi all,
I would like to add CAMERAS to the list of USE_EXPANDed variables. It is
currently used by media-libs/libgphoto2, which can be built with/without
support for the following photo cameras:
adc65 agfa-cl20 aox barbie canon casio clicksmart310 digigr8 digita
dimera directory enigma13 fuj
Christian Heim wrote:
Heya,
net-wireless/ipw2100 and net-wireless/ipw2200 are both kernel drivers built as
an external package through portage. The codebase currently in portage is the
same that is present in any up-to-date kernel tarball (2.6.x).
For this reason I am suggesting, everyone mi
On Thu, 2006-12-21 at 21:47 -0600, Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
> Steve Long wrote:
> > Alec Warner wrote:
> >> http://dev.gentoo.org/~solar/bashrc
> >>
> >> At the bottom of solar's bashrc you will find some lines dealing with
> >> AUTOPATCH, I don't see the bashrc.autopatch in his dev space, but you
Rémi Cardona wrote:
On second thoughts, I'll raise a small objection to the removal. Latest
gentoo version is 1.2.0 while the kernel (gentoo-sources-2.6.19-r2) says
to contain 1.1.4. I know that difference isn't exactly huge, but still,
it's a step backwards.
The only changes from 1.1.4 to 1.
* Vlastimil Babka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> > Hi folks,
> >
> > I've noticed, axis has some commercial/non-free dependencies, ie.
> > sun-javamail-bin and sun-jaf. Are there free replacements for them ?
> >
>
> Yes, sun-javamail and sun-jaf are free (CDDL-licensed)
* Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> I'm going to stop you right there.
> Before claiming design problems in the init system, you could at least
> have the good grace to try out the most current available in portage
> where you would know
Well, I just sync'ed and `emerge -puD system` do
On Saturday 23 December 2006 14:50, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> Well, I just sync'ed and `emerge -puD system` doesn't show up anything
> todo, and I didn't mask out anything. So can I assume my init system
> is up to date ?
i'm pretty sure he's talking about the 1.13 series which he's put a lot of
ti
On Sat, 23 Dec 2006 20:50:06 +0100
Enrico Weigelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> * Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
>
>
>
> > I'm going to stop you right there.
> > Before claiming design problems in the init system, you could at
> > least have the good grace to try out the most current a
* Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> > If the lookup would go directly to checking things like pidfiles
> > (where applicable) instead of the flag files, such problems would
> > (IMHO) be entirely fixed.
>
> well that's why it's just your opinion and not actual fact ...
> pidfiles are
On Sat, 23 Dec 2006 20:50:06 +0100
Enrico Weigelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > 2) A simple status call to the init script checks running daemons
> > and returns either 0 or 1 appropriately allowing a sys admin to
> > report on crashed services and possible take an automated action.
>
> Yes, of
* Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
> baselayout-1.13 is currently package.masked as there are still a few
> upgrade/downgrade issues to resolve with the 1.12 branch. However, it
> is unmasked on BSD profiles where it's enjoying great success.
> Hopefully in the new year it can be moved t
* Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb:
Hi,
> Right now the aac useflag enable support for MP4v2 tags writing through
> libmp4v2; the problem is that the library is licensed under MPL, while Amarok
> is licensed under GPL, and they are likely not compatible one to the other,
>
On Sat, 23 Dec 2006 22:08:15 +0100
Enrico Weigelt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > baselayout-1.13 is currently package.masked as there are still a few
> > upgrade/downgrade issues to resolve with the 1.12 branch. However,
> > it is unmasked on BSD profiles where it's enjoying great success.
> > Hope
Daniel Drake wrote:
> Rémi Cardona wrote:
>> On second thoughts, I'll raise a small objection to the removal.
>> Latest gentoo version is 1.2.0 while the kernel
>> (gentoo-sources-2.6.19-r2) says to contain 1.1.4. I know that
>> difference isn't exactly huge, but still, it's a step backwards.
>
>
On Saturday 23 December 2006 22:35, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> I'm not an license expert
Then shut up.
You're wrong, it's true for dynamic linking as well as for static linking.
--
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://farragut.flameeyes.is-a-geek.org/
Gentoo/Alt lead, Gentoo/FreeBSD, Video, Sound, AL
Hi folks,
since jakub (as always) closes all my bugs, I'll report the issue
to this list before completely giving up and never ever waste a
single second on reporting bugs ...
Lots of packages have an wrong/unnecessary dependency to
postgresql. Three cases:
a) probably traditionally depended
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
Hi folks,
since jakub (as always) closes all my bugs, I'll report the issue
to this list before completely giving up and never ever waste a
single second on reporting bugs ...
Enrico, you know exactly why he does that. Review the last bug you filed
to me if you're clai
Doug Goldstein wrote:
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
Hi folks,
since jakub (as always) closes all my bugs, I'll report the issue to
this list before completely giving up and never ever waste a single
second on reporting bugs ...
Enrico, you know exactly why he does that. Review the last bug you file
Hi Enrico
Enrico Weigelt wrote:
Hi folks,
since jakub (as always) closes all my bugs, I'll report the issue
to this list before completely giving up and never ever waste a
single second on reporting bugs ...
... and we're grateful to you for that.
Lots of packages have an wrong/unnecessary
Enrico Weigelt napsal(a):
> Hi folks,
>
> since jakub (as always) closes all my bugs, I'll report the issue
> to this list before completely giving up and never ever waste a
> single second on reporting bugs ...
Thanks, you've wasted at least one hour of my time I spent duping those
bugs and de
On Saturday 23 December 2006 17:34, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote:
> On Saturday 23 December 2006 22:35, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
> > I'm not an license expert
>
> Then shut up.
>
> You're wrong, it's true for dynamic linking as well as for static linking.
agreed on both points
-mike
pgpAOof6Yol8
On Sat, 2006-12-23 at 20:20 +0100, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
>
> Great :)
> It was really, really ugly getting tomcat emerge'd w/ all this
> commercial crap :(
Blame upstream for using them. Granted the are somewhat optional more on
that below.
> I had some talks w/ tomcat folks
Where? Who? Just c
25 matches
Mail list logo
