Re: [gentoo-dev] Treecleaneres

2006-11-30 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 00:59 -0500, Alec Warner wrote: > By the request of me (treecleaner lead) I'd like to suspend the > treecleaner project until such time as we can meet and re-evaluate our > poilicy. > > In the meantime, please don't remove stuff. > > I'd like to shoot for a meeting on the

[gentoo-dev] http://bugs.gentoo.org/

2006-11-30 Thread Sergey Borodich
Hi, What with http://bugs.gentoo.org/ ? Can anyone fix it ? # date Thu Nov 30 15:31:42 EET 2006 http://bugs.gentoo.org/ Software error: Can't connect to the database. Error: Host 'nuthatch.gentoo.osuosl.org' is blocked because of many connection errors. Unblock with 'mysqladmin flush-hosts'

Re: [gentoo-dev] http://bugs.gentoo.org/

2006-11-30 Thread Wernfried Haas
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 03:34:39PM +0200, Sergey Borodich wrote: > What with http://bugs.gentoo.org/ ? > Can anyone fix it ? 14:48 -!- Topic for #gentoo-dev: "Sometimes on topic" || Bugzie dead, jforman working on it: http://tinyurl.com/y4evnv || Bugday on saturday. Please tell eroyf if you have

Re: [gentoo-dev] http://bugs.gentoo.org/

2006-11-30 Thread Bryan Østergaard
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 03:34:39PM +0200, Sergey Borodich wrote: > Hi, > > What with http://bugs.gentoo.org/ ? > Can anyone fix it ? > > # date > Thu Nov 30 15:31:42 EET 2006 > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/ > > Software error: > > Can't connect to the database. > Error: Host 'nuthatch.gentoo.osuos

Re: [gentoo-dev] http://bugs.gentoo.org/

2006-11-30 Thread Damian Florczyk
Sergey Borodich napisał(a): > Hi, > > What with http://bugs.gentoo.org/ ? > Can anyone fix it ? > > # date > Thu Nov 30 15:31:42 EET 2006 > > http://bugs.gentoo.org/ > > Software error: > > Can't connect to the database. > Error: Host 'nuthatch.gentoo.osuosl.org' is blocked because of many > c

Re: [gentoo-dev] http://bugs.gentoo.org/

2006-11-30 Thread Sergey Borodich
Bryan Østergaard пишет: On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 03:34:39PM +0200, Sergey Borodich wrote: Hi, What with http://bugs.gentoo.org/ ? Can anyone fix it ? # date Thu Nov 30 15:31:42 EET 2006 http://bugs.gentoo.org/ Software error: Can't connect to the database. Error: Host 'nuthatch.gentoo.osuosl

Re: [gentoo-dev] http://bugs.gentoo.org/

2006-11-30 Thread Dale
Damian Florczyk wrote: > > Topic for #gentoo-dev: "[...] Bugzie dead, jforman working on it: > http://tinyurl.com/y4evnv [...]" > > Good God, Gentoo needs more donations from the looks of that pic. LOL My old rig beats that. I mean my OD rig too. O_O Dale :-) :-) :-)

[gentoo-dev] IMPORTANT: bugs/packages/planet/etc downtime

2006-11-30 Thread Lance Albertson
While I know that bugs is currently 'down' because of a mysql issue... Hopefully the downtime scheduled for today will help it a little. We're going to be finally moving the last two machines at the OSL to the new datacenter later this afternoon. The scheduled time will be 2pm PST or 2200 UTC toda

Re: [gentoo-dev] IMPORTANT: bugs/packages/planet/etc downtime

2006-11-30 Thread Roy Marples
On Thursday 30 November 2006 15:56, Lance Albertson wrote: >Unless something comes up, plan for about an hour > downtime for that today. If something comes up, we would be closing bugs ;) -- Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Gentoo Developer (baselayout, networking) -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org maili

Re: [gentoo-dev] Treecleaneres

2006-11-30 Thread Alec Warner
Chris Gianelloni wrote: On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 00:59 -0500, Alec Warner wrote: By the request of me (treecleaner lead) I'd like to suspend the treecleaner project until such time as we can meet and re-evaluate our poilicy. In the meantime, please don't remove stuff. I'd like to shoot for a me

[gentoo-dev] Re: eclass cvs should not use -z4 by default

2006-11-30 Thread Stefan Schweizer
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > and the reply by Mike Frysinger (vapier), maintainer of this eclass: > "i would use -z1 or -z2 as the default and allow people to override it via > make.conf ... but you should send your proposal to the gentoo-dev mailing > list to see how people feel" why not use -z0? N

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] Add ALSA_CARDS to USE_EXPAND

2006-11-30 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
Today I added a 1.0.13_pre20061130 pre-release version of alsa-driver, and I noticed that we currently don't have ALSA_CARDS as IUSE-expanded variable, and that people aren't aware of which drivers are available during build. An easy testing shows me that it works fine: Calculating dependencies

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Add ALSA_CARDS to USE_EXPAND

2006-11-30 Thread Marius Mauch
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006 22:17:29 +0100 "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Today I added a 1.0.13_pre20061130 pre-release version of > alsa-driver, and I noticed that we currently don't have ALSA_CARDS as > IUSE-expanded variable, and that people aren't aware of which drivers > ar

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Add ALSA_CARDS to USE_EXPAND

2006-11-30 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Thursday 30 November 2006 22:40, Marius Mauch wrote: > Not if you take care of providing the proper defaults in > make.defaults (the sample above should not be the default). Forgot to say, if no ALSA_CARDS is set, the default is enabling everything (alsa's default) -- Diego "Flameeyes" Petten

[gentoo-dev] Re: IMPORTANT: bugs/packages/planet/etc downtime

2006-11-30 Thread Lance Albertson
Lance Albertson wrote: > We're going to be finally moving the last two machines at the OSL to the > new datacenter later this afternoon. The scheduled time will be 2pm PST > or 2200 UTC today. Unless something comes up, plan for about an hour > downtime for that today. Both moves have been comple

[gentoo-dev] gentoo-sources-2.4 needs a maintainer

2006-11-30 Thread Daniel Drake
Hi, With Tim gone there is nobody working on gentoo-sources-2.4. I'm not sure what's left in the patchset but on last check there were users depending on it. If anyone is interested please step up, otherwise this will go through the usual mask/removal process. Recruiting a non-developer to t

Re: [gentoo-dev] gentoo-sources-2.4 needs a maintainer

2006-11-30 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Thu, 2006-11-30 at 18:30 -0500, Daniel Drake wrote: > Please mention this in the next GWN. Will do. -- Chris Gianelloni Release Engineering Strategic Lead Alpha/AMD64/x86 Architecture Teams Games Developer/Council Member/Foundation Trustee Gentoo Foundation signature.asc Description: This i

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: IMPORTANT: bugs/packages/planet/etc downtime

2006-11-30 Thread Doug Goldstein
Lance Albertson wrote: > Lance Albertson wrote: > >> We're going to be finally moving the last two machines at the OSL to the >> new datacenter later this afternoon. The scheduled time will be 2pm PST >> or 2200 UTC today. Unless something comes up, plan for about an hour >> downtime for that toda

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: Versioning the tree

2006-11-30 Thread Steve Long
Chris Gianelloni wrote: > It would be much better to simply use what we currently have, > though. Honestly, I was pursuing this with Infra a few months back, and > have since dropped it, due to time constraints. I plan on picking it > back up, as I said, so I don't know what is necessary at this

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Add ALSA_CARDS to USE_EXPAND

2006-11-30 Thread Petteri Räty
Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò kirjoitti: > On Thursday 30 November 2006 22:40, Marius Mauch wrote: >> Not if you take care of providing the proper defaults in >> make.defaults (the sample above should not be the default). > Forgot to say, if no ALSA_CARDS is set, the default is enabling everything > (

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Versioning the tree

2006-11-30 Thread Steve Long
>> There'll always be GLSA's to respond to. That's another issue that >> needs to be handled w/ a slow-moving tree. Are you going to restrict >> changes in the slow-moving tree only to changes against a GLSA? > > That's what we've said. > I don't have a problem with this at all. The slow-moving

[gentoo-dev] Can we have some manners, please?

2006-11-30 Thread Steve Long
Just a general point: I think people are being a bit harsh on Stuart in this thread. I'm picking up on Chris's post as I'm interested in the releng-related stuff, but this isn't exclusively about his responses. Stuart Herbert wrote: > On 11/29/06, Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I'm