-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jakub Moc wrote:
> Harald van Dijk napsal(a):
>> It's meant to be used when the user chooses to reply to the list. That
>> is not necessarily the function of the "Reply" button. In mutt, and IIRC
>> in Thunderbird as well, "reply" is intended to mean "r
Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted
below, on Mon, 16 Oct 2006 23:49:10 +0200:
> Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
>> What's so hard about paying attention when replying?
>
> What's so hard about making the behaviour consistent?
What's so hard about configuring your clien
Simon Stelling wrote:
Paul de Vrieze wrote:
I would go for the EAPI bump. Even then I think it would be smart to
wait a short while for packages to use this as we ensure that the
supporting portage version is stable.
Err, EAPI was designed to assure that a supporting version is actually
used
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
On Fri, 13 Oct 2006 20:12:40 +0100 "Stuart Herbert"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| As the default USE flags are metadata about the package (not the
| profile), it makes sense to store that data in the ebuild, along with
| the rest of the package's metadata.
No no on. Default
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| It's a stupid statement, not providing any further backing for your
| position; please dear god spare us all the waste of time reading
| your emails if that's how you're going to push for what you want...
Not at all. Your argument could be rephrased like this: There ar
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
[rants]
the IUSE="nocxx" is that different than IUSE="+cxx" ?
the per ebuild defaults let you replace the ugly nofoo to +foo,
archiving just the same.
It is evaluated just only if there isn't anything before it (say
make.conf and friends)
So it doesn't look to me that pro
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 13:17:11 +0200
Paul de Vrieze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> That's a nonargument. But let me put it easier. Don't blame us when
> paludis made a design mistake and try to force that mistake on the
> rest of us. Instead fix paludis.
What design mistake? And what the hell does p
Stephen Bennett wrote:
> And what the hell does paludis have to do with this anyway?
[ ] You get the meaning of "analogy". No, this has nothing to do with
"anal".
--
Sebastian Bergmann http://sebastian-bergmann.de/
GnuPG Key: 0xB85B5D69 / 27A7 2B14 09E4 98CD 6277 0
I was running evdev under Xorg 7.0 and 7.1 for my mouse without
problems.
It works if you use it the way they intend it to use it. Read the man
page. Otherwise yea it will crash.
I used it under 7.0 fine but when I upgraded to 7.1 it started causing
xorg to crash on startup same configuration
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 13:07:52 +0100 Stephen Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 13:17:11 +0200
| Paul de Vrieze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
|
| > That's a nonargument. But let me put it easier. Don't blame us when
| > paludis made a design mistake and try to force that mistake
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 14:23:23 +0200
Sebastian Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stephen Bennett wrote:
> > And what the hell does paludis have to do with this anyway?
>
> [ ] You get the meaning of "analogy". No, this has nothing to do with
> "anal".
There is no analogy to be made there
Stephen Bennett wrote:
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 14:23:23 +0200
Sebastian Bergmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Stephen Bennett wrote:
And what the hell does paludis have to do with this anyway?
[ ] You get the meaning of "analogy". No, this has nothing to do with
"anal".
There is no analogy
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 09:43:08 -0400
Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Placing the default USE flags all in the profiles amounts to profile
> duplication where-ever you want to use the ebuilds -> this is
> annoying.
This is exactly why we have cascading profiles, no?
> So that I DON'T need
On 10/17/06, Stephen Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There is no analogy to be made there. Arguing against carrying profile
metadata in IUSE is trying to prevent a design decision, not trying to
work around one by forcing extra work on people.
There seems to be very little support for your p
Stephen Bennett wrote:
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 09:43:08 -0400
Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Placing the default USE flags all in the profiles amounts to profile
duplication where-ever you want to use the ebuilds -> this is
annoying.
This is exactly why we have cascading profiles, no?
S
On Tuesday 17 October 2006 07:30, Luca Barbato wrote:
> the IUSE="nocxx" is that different than IUSE="+cxx" ?
that is where we want to move to
> So it doesn't look to me that problematic, am I missing something?
the issue is that Ciaran wants all of the stuff to be in the profile rather
than in
On Friday 13 October 2006 18:40, Zac Medico wrote:
Wow, this thread is pretty huge.
Might wanna like.. take it to a council meeting or something in a medium (such
as IRC) where message should be going back at forth at this sort of interval.
Either that or just duke it out in a parking lot, tic
On Sat, 14 Oct 2006, Benjamin Judas wrote:
Hello folks,
I took the decision to reanimate "Project Dolphin". Dolphin was an
experimental minimal CD similar to Grmbl aimed at semi-professionals and
professionals to help repair broken systems or minimize data-loss.
Opposites to the official Gent
18 matches
Mail list logo
