On Tue, Oct 3, 2006 at 10:38:32 +0200, Nick Devito wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 18:29 -0400, Michael Cummings wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 14:13 -0700, Chris White wrote:
> > > On Monday 02 October 2006 13:30, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > > > We'll keep status in the topic at #gentoo-dev whi
On Tue, 2006-10-03 at 02:56 +0200, Lionel Bouton wrote:
> Here's an updated draft. I included most of your remarks and added some
> notes on append-flags/filter-flags. I'll probably submit it to Ulrich
> around the end of the week.
I surely hope you don't submit it to Ulrich if you want it to actu
On Mon, 2006-10-02 at 22:58 -0400, Mike Kelly wrote:
> I have a list of all packages in the tree that currently use either of
> those functions[2]. If you maintain one of these packages, I'd
> especially appreciate your feedback.
You missed games-* (yes, all of them) via the games.eclass, but I'm
On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 02:56:42 +0200 Lionel Bouton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Being able to tune the CFLAGS is part of one of the core principles of
| Gentoo: let the user be in control.
What? No it isn't.
| nss_ldap stopped working with -ffast-math (reported to
| break many packages changing wit
On Tuesday 03 October 2006 08:26, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> Your penis length is not proportional to the size of your CFLAGS.
i could update vpenis.sh so that this statement is incorrect ...
-mike
pgp8aNMxlm8sc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Sunday 01 October 2006 02:18, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> This is your monthly friendly reminder ! Same bat time (typically the
> 2nd Thursday at 2000 UTC), same bat channel (#gentoo-council @
> irc.freenode.net) !
due to some council members needing to do lame stuff like study for school,
this h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Lionel Bouton wrote:
> Here's an updated draft. I included most of your remarks and added some
> notes on append-flags/filter-flags. I'll probably submit it to Ulrich
> around the end of the week.
>
> --- Draft BEGIN ---
>
> CFLAGS
>
>
>
> Being a
Josh Saddler wrote the following on 03.10.2006 18:11 :
> (...)
> > Lionel
> Uh, Gentoo-wiki does not get linked.
Are there many trying to link to the Gentoo Wiki in official
documentation? It seems guns are warm and devs quick to jump to
conclusions (re-read the title and the previous discussion o
On Tue, 2006-10-03 at 19:16 +0200, Lionel Bouton wrote:
> Josh Saddler wrote the following on 03.10.2006 18:11 :
> > (...)
> > > Lionel
> > Uh, Gentoo-wiki does not get linked.
>
> Are there many trying to link to the Gentoo Wiki in official
> documentation? It seems guns are warm and devs quick t
On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 08:09:08 -0400
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I have a list of all packages in the tree that currently use either
> > of those functions[2]. If you maintain one of these packages, I'd
> > especially appreciate your feedback.
>
> You missed games-* (yes, all of
On 03/10/06, Daniel Ostrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Gentoo-wiki does not now nor will it ever get linked to from official
Gentoo media, documentation, or anything else within the www.gentoo.org
namespace...
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/app-emulation/xen/xen-3.0.2.ebuild?rev
Daniel Ostrow wrote the following on 03.10.2006 19:22 :
>
> Ok...lets try this...
>
> Gentoo-wiki does not now nor will it ever get linked to from official
> Gentoo media, documentation, or anything else within the www.gentoo.org
> namespace...
>
>
It seemed to me that although it is hosted in
Charlie wrote:
> On 03/10/06, Daniel Ostrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Gentoo-wiki does not now nor will it ever get linked to from official
>> Gentoo media, documentation, or anything else within the www.gentoo.org
>> namespace...
>
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/app-emulati
On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 10:20:53 +0200
Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> beside the syntax, as pointed by Donnie, it looks ok.
> I guess could be possible extract automagically from the current tree
> the data and create the datafile from it, isn't it?
Yeah, it should be. I'm writing up a few
Daniel Ostrow wrote:
It is inherently unreliable and outside of Gentoo's control.
Sorry, I really tried hard, but I just couldn't anymore... Must... say...
__ _ _ _ _ _
/ \ | | | | | | | | _ \ | __ ) / \ / ___|| |
/ _ \ | |
On Tue, 2006-10-03 at 19:49 +0200, Lionel Bouton wrote:
> It seemed to me that although it is hosted in the www.gentoo.org space
> the GWN isn't official Gentoo stuff.
The GWN is staffed entirely by developers. We have non-developer
writers, but the staffers are all developers.
To be honest, rat
Chris Gianelloni wrote the following on 03.10.2006 22:46 :
> On Tue, 2006-10-03 at 19:49 +0200, Lionel Bouton wrote:
>
>> It seemed to me that although it is hosted in the www.gentoo.org space
>> the GWN isn't official Gentoo stuff.
>>
>
> The GWN is staffed entirely by developers. We have
Ciaran McCreesh wrote the following on 03.10.2006 14:26 :
> On Tue, 03 Oct 2006 02:56:42 +0200 Lionel Bouton
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | Being able to tune the CFLAGS is part of one of the core principles of
> | Gentoo: let the user be in control.
>
> What? No it isn't.
>
Maybe it depends
Here's the third version of the draft, wiki-free and with less sugar
too. More warnings.
Thanks again for the input.
--- Draft BEGIN ---
CFLAGS
Being able to tune the CFLAGS is part of one of the core principles of
Gentoo: let the user be in control. Being in control brings both
benefits and
Daniel Ostrow wrote:
> Gentoo-wiki does not now nor will it ever get linked to from official
> Gentoo media, documentation, or anything else within the www.gentoo.org
> namespace...
Really?
http://www.gentoo.org/news/en/gwn/20060424-newsletter.xml
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/overlays/devguide
Daniel Ostrow wrote:
> Gentoo-wiki does not now nor will it ever get linked to from official
> Gentoo media, documentation, or anything else within the www.gentoo.org
> namespace...
Really?
http://www.gentoo.org/news/en/gwn/20060424-newsletter.xml
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/overlays/devguide
To facilitate the maintenance of the java-gnome packages (ie
libgtk-java, libgnome-java, and company), I've created a new eclass.
There are currently seven packages which would be able to use this, and
the number is expected to increase as the java-gnome project adds more
bindings.
The initia
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Andrew Ross wrote:
> Daniel Ostrow wrote:
>
>> Gentoo-wiki does not now nor will it ever get linked to from official
>> Gentoo media, documentation, or anything else within the www.gentoo.org
>> namespace...
>
> Really?
>
> http://www.gentoo.org/new
Josh Saddler wrote:
> And /proj/en/ is up to the individual projects; /proj/ docs have nothing to do
> with /doc/, which is where the primary official Gentoo documents reside.
>> Daniel Ostrow wrote:
>>> or anything else within the www.gentoo.org namespace...
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP
On Tue, 3 Oct 2006 00:44:57 -0400
Mike Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Oct 2006 21:28:21 -0700
> Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'd prefer that the format be key=value for easier use by bash, as
> > pretty much everything else in profiles is bash.
>
> Only issue I
Lionel Bouton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Wed, 04 Oct 2006
01:08:43 +0200:
> Here's the third version of the draft, wiki-free and with less sugar
> too. More warnings.
Thanks for your patience in drafting this. I believe it's well worth the
trouble and will
Mike Kelly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted
[EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Tue,
03 Oct 2006 13:46:03 -0400:
>> Does it need to be tons and tons of small files, or can
>> we get away with a set of larger files with some sort of header?
>
> Hmm, parsing that would be a more difficult task for my
Hi all.
Jon Portnoy (avenj) recently resigned from Developer Relations. In that
regard we had a meeting yesterday discussing the various issues from
that.
The (very) short summary is:
1. We've decided that I'm going to remain as the single devrel lead and
that I will appoint assistants if and whe
28 matches
Mail list logo
