Alec Warner wrote:
> Jakub Moc wrote:
>> Upstream completely sucks and keeps changing the tarballs silently over
>> and over again, so the only solution to the above bug is to remove all
>> of the modules/themes/etc. from the ebuild.
>
> So which sucks, upstream or our unbending policy?
Changing
Hello,
I wanted to get gentoo developers' viewpoints
on 10 slides:
Brief Analysis And Generalisation of Closed-Source
Software Business Models to All Maximum Profit Based
Businesses
http://www.archive.org/download/profitAndPoverty/slide1.html
Thanks,
Mashi
___
I wanted to fill bugzilla report about this but found few existing
without neither serious solution nor being current.
There is an incosistency in current xinitrc behaviour (i'm only talking
about xinitrc run through startx, not {k,g,x}dm).
Problems:
1. /etc/X11/xinitrc tries to load xresources
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> how about a local USE flag like "all-the-junk-in-the-trunk" ?
>
> Why? Just makes more work for us, for no apparent reason. I'd rather be
> able to pull unused stuff from the tree after a while than add a new
> option to install stuff nobody will e
Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
how about a local USE flag like "all-the-junk-in-the-trunk" ?
Why? Just makes more work for us, for no apparent reason. I'd rather be
able to pull unused stuff from the tree after a while than add a new
option to install st
Stephen P. Becker wrote:
> Steev Klimaszewski wrote:
>> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>>> Mike Frysinger wrote:
how about a local USE flag like "all-the-junk-in-the-trunk" ?
>>> Why? Just makes more work for us, for no apparent reason. I'd rather be
>>> able to pull unused stuff from the tree after a
Alec Warner wrote:
> Chris Gianelloni wrote:
>> On Wed, 2006-09-06 at 21:19 -0600, Ryan Hill wrote:
>>> Elfyn McBratney wrote:
>>>
I've been inspired by the local/global USE flag threads recently
posted by Doug (Cardoe), and it got me to thinking... I've recently
joined the pkgcore d
On 9/7/06, Chris White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So, wondering why people use Gentoo. Put [dev] or something if you're an
actual gentoo dev and [user] if you're a user. Doesn't need to be fancy, you
can put "community" or something if that's all you want. All responses off
list please. Thank
So, wondering why people use Gentoo. Put [dev] or something if
you're an actual gentoo dev and [user] if you're a user. Doesn't
need to be fancy, you can put "community" or something if that's all
you want. All responses off list please. Thanks.
I use Gentoo because of its intelligent user c
On 10/09/06, Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So, wondering why people use Gentoo. Put [dev] or something if
> you're an actual gentoo dev and [user] if you're a user. Doesn't
> need to be fancy, you can put "community" or something if that's all
> you want. All responses off list please
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi everyone,
Portage currently has two hard-coded lists of variables that control
the behavior of env-update. I'd like to make these variables
configurable so that package maintainers have direct control over
them. The variables break down into two
Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Portage currently has two hard-coded lists of variables that control
> the behavior of env-update. I'd like to make these variables
> configurable so that package maintainers have direct control over
> them. The variables break down into two basic types: co
12 matches
Mail list logo
