-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stefan Schweizer wrote:
> Josh Saddler wrote:
>
>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>> Hash: SHA1
>>
>> Stefan Schweizer wrote:
>> [. . .]
>>
>> Define "contributors" -- is this a special status? If it is, how does one
>> *become* a "contributor" to
On Sun, 03 Sep 2006 17:54:33 -0600
Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> > If you don't care whether a package is stable or not, just let the
> > arch team go ahead and do what they need to do to stabilise when
> > they wish to. The role of package maintainer has nothing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 3 Sep 2006, Grant Goodyear wrote:
38 (forums folk) --> ?? What's the status here?
glep-0038.txt 1.5 10 months tomk Changed the status from Accepted to Final
Thus, --> IF
/Anders
- --
Anders Hellgren (kallamej)
Gentoo Forums Administrat
Josh Saddler wrote:
> Stefan Schweizer wrote:
>> Josh Saddler wrote:
>>
>>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>
>>> Stefan Schweizer wrote:
>>> [. . .]
>>>
>>> Define "contributors" -- is this a special status? If it is, how does
>>> one *become* a "contributor" to get these righ
Stefan Schweizer wrote:
> Elfyn McBratney wrote:
>> thus that developer can request
>> write access for them. It's worked like that for at least two
>> years...
>
> I did that and devrel asked me to write a GLEP. If you can show me another
> way to do it, I would like to hear about it! I have two
On Monday 04 September 2006 02:45, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
> Josh Saddler wrote:
> > Stefan Schweizer wrote:
> > [. . .]
> >
> > Define "contributors" -- is this a special status? If it is, how does one
> > *become* a "contributor" to get these rights?
> >
> > This is potentially a big problem, the
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 04 September 2006 02:45, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
>> Josh Saddler wrote:
>> > Stefan Schweizer wrote:
>> > [. . .]
>> >
>> > Define "contributors" -- is this a special status? If it is, how does
>> > one *become* a "contributor" to get these rights?
>> >
>> > This
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Stefan Schweizer wrote:
> they are not defined by their status. I wonder why this word is causing
> problems ..
>
> The status is maybe being an arch tester. This GLEP is not about status,
> only about giving some people bugzilla access when needed.
>
On Monday 04 September 2006 04:32, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
> they are not defined by their status. I wonder why this word is causing
> problems ..
of course they are defined by their status ... you cant go handing out
bugzilla access to joe blow because he "contributed something"
> The status is
Yes indeed my best audience, Gentoo now has a new developer in town. His
name? Not important. His function? Not important either. His looks? Ugly as
hell... why we want him? Because I am fond of french wifes, and he has one.
Yes indeed my best audience, anigel is a Frenchie, a "Limougeaud" to be
e
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sven Vermeulen wrote:
> At least there's one sane property on this guy - he doesn't like the Perl
> language. And for that alone I disregard his mushroom incident... as long as
> he doesn't think he sees Larry fly.
Bah. Can't believe I read through al
On Mon, 2006-09-04 at 13:06 +0200, Sven Vermeulen wrote:
> Yes indeed my best audience, Gentoo now has a new developer in town. His
> name? Not important. His function? Not important either. His looks? Ugly as
> hell... why we want him? Because I am fond of french wifes, and he has one.
>
> Yes in
Josh Saddler wrote:
> Because as much as possible, we need to see something concrete, not "maybe
> an arch tester." We need to have a better definition of what "when needed
> is" and who these "some people" are -- think about it. Do we want a system
> that works like devship, but only halfway -- li
Stefan Schweizer wrote:
> it
> is meant to be as non-concrete as possible to allow usage in as many cases
> as possible.
Which makes it pretty pointless. Really, this GLEP says almost nothing,
it's simply too vague to express any intend.
--
Kind Regards,
Simon Stelling
Gentoo/AMD64 developer
--
Josh Saddler wrote:
> Stefan Schweizer wrote:
>>> they are not defined by their status. I wonder why this word is causing
>>> problems ..
>>>
>>> The status is maybe being an arch tester. This GLEP is not about status,
>>> only about giving some people bugzilla access when needed.
>>>
>>> -stefan
>
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 09:43:23AM -0400, Michael Cummings wrote:
> Sven Vermeulen wrote:
> > At least there's one sane property on this guy - he doesn't like the Perl
> > language. And for that alone I disregard his mushroom incident... as long as
> > he doesn't think he sees Larry fly.
>
> Bah.
On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 08:38:19PM -0400, Alec Warner wrote:
> Stefan Schweizer wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > as requested by multiple devrel members I have written a GLEP to standardize
> > bugzilla access for contributors. It has already been discussed on the
> > devrel mailing list before but I am loo
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 08:35:54AM +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
> Alec Warner wrote:
> > C. No real standard on any other fora. I don't need a GLEP to add
> > someone to my project overlay, or grant them voice or ops in my
> > project's IRC channel. I don't need a GLEP to get them subscribed t
On Mon, 04 Sep 2006 00:59:44 +0200
Stefan Schweizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> An example for this has been obvious since the overlays project was
> established. Bugs for overlays should be filed on bugs.gentoo.org and
> will most likely get assigned to the developer/herd. This does allow
> a co
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 01:54:02PM +0200, Stefan Schweizer wrote:
> Josh Saddler wrote:
> > Because as much as possible, we need to see something concrete, not "maybe
> > an arch tester." We need to have a better definition of what "when needed
> > is" and who these "some people" are -- think about
I've just package.masked media-video/lve and media-video/klvemkdvd which will be
removed in 30 days unless someone offers to maintain them.
See bug #145200 for more info.
Steve
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Grant Goodyear wrote:
> 42 (critical news) --> Change owner to zmedico?
Yes, I'll adopt it.
Zac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFE/FW3/ejvha5XGaMRAvILAKCUtgAfK4MJzvcmDMnXKHDLiP+7qgCeNU/a
b1umAqjbf5AGkJRmOmhjT+Y=
Bryan Ãstergaard wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 03, 2006 at 08:38:19PM -0400, Alec Warner wrote:
>> Stefan Schweizer wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> as requested by multiple devrel members I have written a GLEP to standardize
>>> bugzilla access for contributors. It has already been discussed on the
>>> devrel mailin
On Mon, Sep 04, 2006 at 02:59:43PM -0400, Alec Warner wrote:
> Bryan Ãstergaard wrote:
> > If people are randomly given bugzie privs (or any other privs) this is
> > something we need to fix. And just to make this clear to all - handing
> > out privs is only half the equation and it's already hard
On 9/3/06, Luis Francisco Araujo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Richard Fish wrote:
> The problem I see is that for Gentoo the releases are not really
> useful milestones for most projects. A release is really significant
That is not a problem. That is a feature.
A small clarification may be nece
On 9/3/06, Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I really wish people would take the time to either ask the Release
Engineering team, or learn how we work before they go off making
accusations against us.
There was no accusation there. I picked on X only for its popularity
and relative e
On Sun, 3 Sep 2006 22:53:44 -0500
Grant Goodyear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 42 (critical news) --> Change owner to zmedico?
I had semi-unofficially taken over this one, and updated it with
reference implementations etc. Last I knew it had been submitted to the
council, but I never heard of the
There are two adopt-a-developer policy changes. The max value limit for each
item has been raised from $100 to $250. Things are going well and we plan
on removing the limit entirely in the future. We're just waiting for an
accountant to get back to Christel about some questions we have relating to
You can find the code in my public_html on d.g.o[1]
The git commit stuff will probably take a million years. I think I will
have to find a better way to have commiting with git from GIT_DIR
working, or I shall go and beat up linus until he implements the
functionality I need ;) Feel free to try
On Fri, 2006-09-01 at 16:59 +0200, Carsten Lohrke wrote:
> On Friday 01 September 2006 15:45, Luis Medinas wrote:
> > I'm sure that situation will be fixed by the upstream (Jörg) since it
> > violates GPL license. About the debian fork we will take a look at it
> > and see where's going.
>
> Read
On Tuesday 05 September 2006 05:38, Luis Medinas wrote:
> Now the license problems are fixed and we can ship this on our portage
> tree tarballs for our new releases etc...
Err, I think the problem was for binpkg, we could already ship cdrtools on the
portage tree tarballs... ebuilds are GPL2.
--
31 matches
Mail list logo
