A normal user doesn't install 50 themes, install maybe 5 themes?
about 100kb per theme? 500kb of waste space per user, not too much, now think
how many kb wsate all the themes ebuilds, digest, etc and how much time it take
to sync.
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 02:11:00 -0400 (EDT)
"Michael Sterrett -Mr.
On 8/21/06, Jose Alberto Suarez Lopez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
A normal user doesn't install 50 themes, install maybe 5 themes?
about 100kb per theme? 500kb of waste space per user, not too much, now think
how many kb wsate all the themes ebuilds, digest, etc and how much time it take
to sync
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 11:43:13AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> someone remind me why our emul packages install in some obscure directory
> tree
> rooted in /emul
>
> if we moved these things to the standard lib32 dirs, it would certainly ease
> the pain of people doing multilib building, bot
On Sun, 2006-08-20 at 00:44 +0530, Shyam Mani wrote:
> Hi Everyone,
>
>
> Please welcome our latest forums staff, Jorge Vicetto aka jmbsvicetto.
>
> So, throw up the usual parties, say hello when you meet him and make him
> feel at home :)
Welcome Sir! :)
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing li
On Mon, 2006-21-08 at 18:29 +0530, Abhay Kedia wrote:
> On 8/20/06, Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 20, 2006 at 09:14:24AM +0200, Michael Weyersh??user wrote:
> > > Abhay Kedia wrote:
> > > > Can someone suggest an appropriate alternate please?
> > >
> > > I don't know if i
On Mon, 2006-21-08 at 12:21 +0100, Herbie Hopkins wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 11:43:13AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > someone remind me why our emul packages install in some obscure directory
> > tree
> > rooted in /emul
> >
> > if we moved these things to the standard lib32 dirs, it wo
On Sunday 20 August 2006 08:18, Abhay Kedia wrote:
> On 8/18/06, Christian Heim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The media-sound/alsaplayer package is pending removal as requested by
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] for multiple buffer overflows [1], dead upstream [1] and a
> > crash occurring when playing uLaw
On Monday 21 August 2006 10:29, Olivier Crête wrote:
> On Mon, 2006-21-08 at 12:21 +0100, Herbie Hopkins wrote:
> > I've always viewed the emul libs as a temporary measure until we had full
> > multilib fuctionality in portage. Afaik the only person working on this
> > was eradicator who has been m
On Mon, 2006-21-08 at 13:28 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 21 August 2006 10:29, Olivier Crête wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-21-08 at 12:21 +0100, Herbie Hopkins wrote:
> > > I've always viewed the emul libs as a temporary measure until we had full
> > > multilib fuctionality in portage. Afaik
On Monday 21 August 2006 13:39, Olivier Crete wrote:
> Will we make emul-x86-gtk-libs block gtk+? We dont have use based
> deps/blockers...
building for ABI is unrelated to USE flags
> how long will it take before we have API/arch based
> ones.
you really think having users build ABI stuff on t
Herbie Hopkins wrote:
I'm not sure why /emul was originally chosen though it's a choice I've
just gone along with whilst maintaining these packages. I've always
viewed the emul libs as a temporary measure until we had full multilib
fuctionality in portage. Afaik the only person working on this wa
It has been noted that certain projects do not communicate their
activities well.
Many projects provide documentation for things(java), provide status
updates on things(ppc), have bits in the gwn (x86,userrel,amd64),
Release releases (releng), or have active webpages (adopt-a-dev, bugday)
There a
Your concerns are well noted. The trustees in general are quiet even
amongst themselves, but I hope this changes with the new board coming in
next week (ish?). It's been my idea to propose that someone (tsunam was
in my head) publish a trustee monthly news or something.
The one I'm curious about
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:56:11 -0400
Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [...] So below we have 3 large far-reaching projects.
>
> Gentoo Quality Assurance Team
> Gentoo Infrastructure Team
> Gentoo Portage Team
> Gentoo Foundation
> Gentoo Council
>
> All 5 of these projects are active
it's
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:56:11 -0400 Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| I request that these teams present status reports bi-weekly (thats one
| every two weeks). You don't even have to write the reports, I will
| volunteer to bug you every two weeks about what is going on in your
| project an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Seemant Kulleen wrote:
> Your concerns are well noted. The trustees in general are quiet even
> amongst themselves, but I hope this changes with the new board coming in
> next week (ish?). It's been my idea to propose that someone (tsunam was
> in my
Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:56:11 -0400
> Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> [...] So below we have 3 large far-reaching projects.
>>
>> Gentoo Quality Assurance Team
>> Gentoo Infrastructure Team
>> Gentoo Portage Team
>> Gentoo Foundation
>> Gentoo Council
>>
>> All 5
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:56:11 -0400 Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | I request that these teams present status reports bi-weekly (thats one
> | every two weeks). You don't even have to write the reports, I will
> | volunteer to bug you every two weeks about what
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 20:21:15 -0400 Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| The problem with them delivering is that many would probably just not
| show up.
Hence why I said 'to the council for their monthly meeting', not 'at
the council's monthly meeting'.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
Mail: c
On Mon, 21 Aug 2006 18:56:11 -0400
Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It has been noted that certain projects do not communicate their
> activities well.
>
> Many projects provide documentation for things(java), provide status
> updates on things(ppc), have bits in the gwn (x86,userrel,amd6
20 matches
Mail list logo
