Re: [gentoo-dev] Brand spanking new developer - Anrdrew Ross aka aross

2006-08-09 Thread Daniel Black
> > Hope so - don't want rumors that Gentoo kills relationships. > > Yes, that would be bad.. and may make the need for date-a-dev even more > apparant.. And we don't want that. (There is no way I'm letting antarus > and ChrisWhite win..) Adopt a Developer needs developer requests? -- Daniel Bl

Re: [gentoo-dev] per-package USE defaults

2006-08-09 Thread Kevin F. Quinn
On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 17:49:40 -0400 Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Tuesday 08 August 2006 15:18, Zac Medico wrote: > > Stuart Herbert wrote: > > > Any chance of per-package USE defaults support? That's much more > > > useful to me. > > > > Attached to bug 61732 there's a patch that

[gentoo-dev] Re: mulltiib cruft: /emul

2006-08-09 Thread Duncan
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED], excerpted below, on Tue, 08 Aug 2006 11:43:13 -0400: > looks like your mail server ate this ... > > someone remind me why our emul packages install in some obscure > directory tree rooted in /emul > > if we moved these things to the s

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: mulltiib cruft: /emul

2006-08-09 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Wednesday 09 August 2006 10:57, Duncan wrote: > Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted > > looks like your mail server ate this ... > > > > someone remind me why our emul packages install in some obscure > > directory tree rooted in /emul > > > > if we moved these things to the standard lib32

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: mulltiib cruft: /emul

2006-08-09 Thread Danny van Dyk
Am Mittwoch, 9. August 2006 17:50 schrieb Mike Frysinger: > On Wednesday 09 August 2006 10:57, Duncan wrote: > > Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted > > Pure speculation here, but the idea /might/ have been to separate > > prebuilt binary stuff into /emul, so it wouldn't conflict with > > fut

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: mulltiib cruft: /emul

2006-08-09 Thread Richard Fish
On 8/9/06, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: i asked some others and they didnt get the e-mail either ... looks like our gentoo mail server is really starting to crash here ... http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=141904 -Richard -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Who wants to tinker with a Palm Zire 71?

2006-08-09 Thread Noack, Sebastian
Title: Who wants to tinker with a Palm Zire 71? Hi, I have a Palm Zire 71 device, with Palm OS on it and a 400 MHz ARM-Processor in it. Actually I don't use this device anymore, so if somebody wants try to get Gentoo Linux run on it, I would give it to him. There is an SD/MMC-Slot which cou

Re: [gentoo-dev] Who wants to tinker with a Palm Zire 71?

2006-08-09 Thread Steev Klimaszewski
Noack, Sebastian wrote: > Hi, > > I have a Palm Zire 71 device, with Palm OS on it and a 400 MHz > ARM-Processor in it. Actually I don't use this device anymore, so if > somebody wants try to get Gentoo Linux run on it, I would give it to him. > > There is an SD/MMC-Slot which could become used t

Re: [gentoo-dev] use.force as a complement to use.mask in profiles

2006-08-09 Thread Brian Harring
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 09:23:34PM +0200, Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote: > On Tue, 8 Aug 2006 00:22:50 -0700, > Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > forcing cxx on via package.mask for gcc > > sys-devel/gcc[-cxx] > > If i want to build a cxx-free system, am i supposed to add > "sys-

[gentoo-dev] moving gen_usr_ldscript() from eutils.eclass to toolchain-funcs.eclass

2006-08-09 Thread Mike Frysinger
as the subject says, i'd like to move gen_usr_ldscript() to toolchain-funcs.elcass ... the reason for this is that i have an improvement to the function which will start writing OUTPUT_FORMAT() to ldscripts, but this requires $(tc-getCC) motivation: better multilib handling :) speak now before