On Saturday 28 January 2006 12:30, Marcelo Góes wrote:
> On 1/28/06, Grobian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The question here now actually is: "is csh worth the hassle, or not?"
> > My opinion is that it is not.
>
> csh_is_not_worth_it++;
> It is causing trouble and not adding functionality. Unless
Marcelo Góes wrote:
>
>If INSTALL_MASK is the correct way to prevent logrotate stuff from
>being installed, then those 8 ebuilds I mentioned earlier should drop
>the USE flag and install it by default. That's probably easier to fix,
>too.
>
>
This cannot be done for squid, because this useflag s
The last drop: 498 to 465, a change of 33 -- adequate, but should be
better since this was for close to three days.
Progress graph:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/broken_modular/broken_modular_progress.png
Latest list:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~spyderous/broken_modular/broken_modular_maintainers.
On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 18:58:52 -0800
Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You want people to recompile the whole package to get another
> text file installed?
When would one recompile a package just for that? Only case i can
think of is when someone who already has setup his apache / ftp /
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 11:07:15 +0100
Thomas de Grenier de Latour <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> i would not appreciate to see it suddenly handling a new service
> because a xinet.d file has been silently added by a new version
> of an ebuild.
Ok, i see all files i have installed in that dir have disa
Thanks guys ;)
Seems we have some Mar[ck]us'es and also Joker and Jokey.. Sure will be
fun ;)
Tobias Scherbaum wrote:
>... and once again a candidate for the one and only German conspiracy >:)
What about german conspiracy meet up at fosdem? ;)
Greets,
Markus
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing l
On 27-01-2006 08:44:14 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Monday 23 January 2006 23:04, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > for those who dont know what i'm talking about, consider:
> > tail -1
> > head -1
> >
>
> it would seem i lied about this (at least the first two still work)
FYI:
sort +0 doesn't work
Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 18:58:52 -0800
> Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> You want people to recompile the whole package to get another
>> text file installed?
>
> When would one recompile a package just for that? Only case i can
> think of is when
On Wednesday 25 January 2006 02:26, Brian Harring wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2006 at 08:06:12PM -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > i would be ok with implementing the back end (i.e. FEATURES=debug-build)
> > but putting off the front end (i.e. emerge --debug-build)
>
> Front-end doesn't matter, it's th
Hi,
Due to some notes that I have binary files in the tree on some packages I used
to maintain ages ago, I came to the fact that we still have openhbci in the
tree.
openhbci is a library for the german homebanking computer interface standard.
It has been replaced by the much advanced aqbanking
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, Jan 29, 2006 at 07:46:30AM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> We already had this discussion. It's not that it's another file, it's
> that it's another file in /etc, which is backed up and requires
> administrator attention on every upgrade. Packa
On Saturday 14 January 2006 15:01, Marcus D. Hanwell wrote:
> I propose creating a new category, sci-visualization, to house scientific
> visualization applications. There are at least 17 applications I have
> identified which are already in the tree that could be moved. Many of them
> are in media
Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote:
> Or again another one (a bit ugly imho tho): merge the files in an
> "/etc/logrotate.d.dist" directory, and add an eselect module to
> handle symlinks from "/etc/logrotate.d".
What's ugly about this? I like it.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signa
Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 18:58:52 -0800
> Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> You want people to recompile the whole package to get another
>> text file installed?
>
> When would one recompile a package just for that? Only case i can
> think of is when
Brian Harring wrote: [Fri Jan 20 2006, 10:42:39AM CST]
> Email's pretty simple- from where I'm sitting, there doesn't seem to
> be any actual progress on trustees issues.
That's a pretty good synopsis.
> 1) Copyright assignment. Check the nfp archives, last comment is sep
> 26th, seems to be t
>> You say, that it's the intended behaviour, that bootstrap.sh keeps the
>> crippled gcc 3.3 intact and as the default compiler.
>
> ok, i looked into this some more and ran some tests ...
>
> long and short of it is that the behavior i discussed before applies only in
> a
> stage3 and beyond
On Sunday 29 January 2006 20:37, Sven Köhler wrote:
> >> You say, that it's the intended behaviour, that bootstrap.sh keeps the
> >> crippled gcc 3.3 intact and as the default compiler.
> >
> > ive chatted with wolf and the real fix here is to change the 'emerge
> > clean' at the end of bootstrap.s
>> I also noticed the "--oneshot" fix.
>
> i noted this already elsewhere in the thread
>
> dont you read all of the e-mails !?
???
I just wanted to say "Thank you" for both fixes.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On Sunday 29 January 2006 20:50, Sven Köhler wrote:
> >> I also noticed the "--oneshot" fix.
> >
> > i noted this already elsewhere in the thread
> >
> > dont you read all of the e-mails !?
>
> ???
>
> I just wanted to say "Thank you" for both fixes.
sorry i forgot the
-mike
--
gentoo-dev@gento
After reading Donnie's interesting post about how to set VIDEO_CARDS and
INPUT_DEVICES in xorg 7, I wondered for a while if LINGUAS should have the
same treatment.
Defining LINGUAS variable would be useful to allow people to know whether they
are going to have special support for their language
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 13:51:25 -0800
Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote:
> > Or again another one (a bit ugly imho tho): merge the files in
> > an "/etc/logrotate.d.dist" directory, and add an eselect module
> > to handle symlinks from "/etc/logrotate.d".
On Sun, 29 Jan 2006 13:51:29 -0800
Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And any other "new" file in /etc you also want a USE flag
> introduced for? Sounds real scalable. Or is this just an
> exception from the rule?
Sure it's an exception. I make the difference beetween:
- usual /etc/ fi
Thomas de Grenier de Latour wrote:
> It would be interesting to know how that happened for in the past
> for /etc/bash_completion.d, which made a similar move iirc
Yes, it would.
> (although real files went to /usr/share/something, whereas here i
> would rather see them in etc because they are mo
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 07:15:57 +0100 Thomas de Grenier de Latour
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| It would be interesting to know how that happened for in the past
| for /etc/bash_completion.d, which made a similar move iirc
Have you any idea how slow bash is if you use all the completion files
for ever
On Mon, 30 Jan 2006 06:17:36 +0100 "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| Also, as repoman complain about linguas_blabla not being a valid
| useflags, all the linguas_* useflags should be listed in use.desc
No, part of the point of USE_EXPAND is that they shouldn't. This is a
rep
25 matches
Mail list logo
