On 12/30/05, Dan Meltzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/29/05, Jory A. Pratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > Unless there are any major objections tomorrow night I will commit
> > mozextension.eclass to the tree. You can find moze
Jory A. Pratt wrote:
> Unless there are any major objections tomorrow night I will commit
> mozextension.eclass to the tree. You can find mozextension.eclass at
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~anarchy/eclass . You can also find the firefox
> and firefox-bin ebuilds at http://dev.gentoo.org/~anarchy/
On Fri, 2005-12-30 at 10:35 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> On Friday 30 December 2005 01:35, Spider (DmD Lj) wrote:
> > On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 19:06 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > > On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 19:53:14 +0100 Carsten Lohrke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > >
> > Thats actually viable. For -installe
On Friday 30 December 2005 21:17, Spider (DmD Lj) wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-12-30 at 10:35 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> > On Friday 30 December 2005 01:35, Spider (DmD Lj) wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2005-12-27 at 19:06 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 27 Dec 2005 19:53:14 +0100 Carsten Lohrke <[
On Fri, 2005-12-30 at 21:49 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
> On Friday 30 December 2005 21:17, Spider (DmD Lj) wrote:
> >
> > No, what you suggested was that for the case of when you depend on a
> > SLOT, then the tree is flattened. My point was for the generic case :
> >
> > DEPEND=">=kde-base/kdeli
On Friday 30 December 2005 22:13, Spider (DmD Lj) wrote:
> it would block against "requirement of same package with different SLOT.
>
> However, since the ~ atoms are explicit and separate ( this depend tree
> could as well be called :
> app-text/docbook-sgml-dtd:3.0
> app-text/docbook-sgml-dtd:3.1
On 12/30/05, Stefan Schweizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/30/05, Dan Meltzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 12/29/05, Jory A. Pratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > > Hash: SHA1
> > >
> > > Unless there are any major objections tomorrow night
On 12/30/05, Dan Meltzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Do you mind addressing
> > > http://article.gmane.org/gmane.linux.gentoo.devel/34397
> >
> >
> > You are kidding?
> > It had enough time now.
> >
> > And it was already addressed as the eclass was not added on monday.
>
> My appologies, tim
On Fri, 2005-12-30 at 22:54 +0900, Jason Stubbs wrote:
>
>
> A still inelegant solution, but one that I could live with, is to
> leave SLOT handling as it is now and to take Brian's syntax of
> key:slot,slot using it specifically for the case where a set of
> ebuilds must all use the same slot.
Hi All,
Just to let you know that as of tonight there is no guarantees on when I
will be back online. I pack up my most valued of possessions (in case
you never guessed, its my computer kit ;)) and get ready to board a
one-way ticket to York.
Anyone in the area who fancies meeting up for a drink
051230 John Mylchreest wrote:
> as of tonight I pack up my most valued of possessions -- my computer kit --
> and get ready to board a one-way ticket to York.
York of the Minster & bright new archbishop or our own Muddy York ?
--
,,
On Fri, 2005-12-30 at 13:06 -0500, Philip Webb wrote:
> 051230 John Mylchreest wrote:
> > as of tonight I pack up my most valued of possessions -- my computer kit --
> > and get ready to board a one-way ticket to York.
>
> York of the Minster & bright new archbishop or our own Muddy York ?
Minste
On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 13:06:47 -0500 Philip Webb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| 051230 John Mylchreest wrote:
| > as of tonight I pack up my most valued of possessions -- my
| > computer kit -- and get ready to board a one-way ticket to York.
|
| York of the Minster & bright new archbishop or our own
Stefan Schweizer wrote:
> On 12/30/05, Dan Meltzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>On 12/29/05, Jory A. Pratt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>Unless there are any major objections tomorrow night I will commit
>>>mozextension.eclass to the tree. You can find mozextension.eclass at
>>>http://de
051230 John Mylchreest wrote:
as of tonight I pack up my most valued of possessions -- my computer kit --
and get ready to board a one-way ticket to York.
I guess that means I won't be the only American in ##uk anymore. ;-)
Have fun in New York John!
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
just a heads up ... i'm going to be adding the ca-certificates package as a
PDEPEND to the openssl package so most everyone in Gentoo will end up with it
on their system
for those wondering what this is:
http://packages.debian.org/unstable/misc/ca-certificates
basically it's additional certifica
Hi,
On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 17:34:59 -0500
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> just a heads up ... i'm going to be adding the ca-certificates package as a
> PDEPEND to the openssl package so most everyone in Gentoo will end up with it
> on their system
>
> for those wondering what this is:
Yuri Vasilevski wrote:
Now, being a little bit less ideological, I think it is perfectly ok to
add certificates from some organizations like CACert.org that try to
make security free for all Internet users as well as open source
projects' certificates (like debian ones). But it should be up to
bu
On Friday 30 December 2005 23:17, Curtis Napier wrote:
> Would it be best to make it into a USE flag so users have the choice,
> install it by default or simply not offer it at all?
>
> Both sides should be happy with a USE flag IMHO. So long as it closes
> the wget bug I'm all for it.
a USE flag
Curtis Napier wrote:
> Yuri Vasilevski wrote:
>
>> Now, being a little bit less ideological, I think it is perfectly ok to
>> add certificates from some organizations like CACert.org that try to
>> make security free for all Internet users as well as open source
>> projects' certificates (like deb
20 matches
Mail list logo
