On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 08:51:42AM +0100, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 07:59:23 +0100
> Harald van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 03:50:16AM +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > my gnu stack docs are actually complete:
> > > http://hardened.gentoo.org/gn
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 08:44:33AM +0100, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> The seriousness of the textrel issue is different for Hardened Gentoo
> and normal Gentoo. For Hardened Gentoo they cause real problems and
> must to be fixed to avoid compromising the overall strategy. For
> non-hardened Gentoo it
Gee, wouldn't it be nice for us lazy folks if the word [Security] (in
some common fashion) were included in the summary line of security
related bugs? i should seriously hope this doesn't warrant a glep, more
of a "anyone else think it'd be worth asking the security folks about"
question. (reason b
On Wednesday 14 December 2005 09:52, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 09:11:51 +0900 Jason Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> wrote:
> | newsdir="$(portageq envvar PORTDIR)/metadata/news"
> | newsdir="$(portageq newsdir gentoo)"
> |
> | Both have one level of indirection. The first has two
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 09:19:56AM +0100, Harald van D??k wrote:
> LDFLAGS? Assuming you meant ASFLAGS, this doesn't affect C files,
correct
> would need rechecking of the assembly code on updates just as much as
> patches which add .note.GNU-stack would, right?
no
you were supposed to send tha
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 06:00:21AM -0500, Michael Cummings wrote:
> Gee, wouldn't it be nice for us lazy folks if the word [Security] (in
> some common fashion) were included in the summary line of security
> related bugs?
this really should have been sent to the security mailing list and
cc-ed th
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 06:00:21AM -0500, Michael Cummings wrote:
>
>>Gee, wouldn't it be nice for us lazy folks if the word [Security] (in
>>some common fashion) were included in the summary line of security
>>related bugs?
>
>
> this really should have been sent to the
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 01:43:28PM +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 09:19:56AM +0100, Harald van D??k wrote:
> > LDFLAGS? Assuming you meant ASFLAGS, this doesn't affect C files,
>
> correct
>
> > would need rechecking of the assembly code on updates just as much as
> > patc
On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 13:55 +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> this really should have been sent to the security mailing list and
> cc-ed the security team
>
> this has come up before on those lists, i just dont remember the
> outcome :P
See, this is my (*cough*lazy*cough*) ignorance shining bright a
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 03:27:54PM +0100, Harald van D??k wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 01:43:28PM +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 09:19:56AM +0100, Harald van D??k wrote:
> > > would need rechecking of the assembly code on updates just as much as
> > > patches which add
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 02:38:00PM +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> there's a few problems with trying to get configure to detect whether
> the host assembler supports the --noexecstack option:
> - it's very easy to get the detection wrong and i'd bet money that
>anyone doing it for the first ti
On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 00:25 +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 05:59:17PM -0600, Jory A. Pratt wrote:
> > Mark Loeser wrote:
> > > Basically what I'm looking for here is an easy to understand explanation
> > > of
> > > what textrels are, why they are bad, and why they should ho
On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 00:25 +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 05:59:17PM -0600, Jory A. Pratt wrote:
> > Mark Loeser wrote:
> > > Basically what I'm looking for here is an easy to understand explanation
> > > of
> > > what textrels are, why they are bad, and why they should ho
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 10:27:19AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-12-14 at 00:25 +, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Tue, Dec 13, 2005 at 05:59:17PM -0600, Jory A. Pratt wrote:
> > > Only problem I see with this is binary packages. We can not control
> > > upstream binaries as everyo
Lance Albertson wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>
>>this has come up before on those lists, i just dont remember the
>>outcome :P
>
> Don't forget about jforman!
The outcome was that Bugzilla Product (here, "Gentoo Security")
could/should/would be added as a Bugzilla mail header so that proper
fi
To all,
Once again, it's time to attempt the bugzilla-2.20 upgrade on
bugs.gentoo.org. I've tested this at home, and spoken to the bugzilla
maintainers and it seems the issue I had earlier with the upgrade is
easily remedied. I've spoken with a few dev's and plan to do the upgrade
at Noon EST on F
On Wednesday 14 December 2005 06:16, Grant Goodyear wrote:
> Jason Stubbs wrote: [Mon Dec 12 2005, 08:06:54PM CST]
>
> > The purpose of GLEPs is to coordinate several teams into providing an
> > overall enhancement to Gentoo. However, the GLEP itself is written by
> > a single person rather than a
maillog: 14/12/2005-11:14:11(-0500): Jeffrey Forman types
> To all,
>
> Once again, it's time to attempt the bugzilla-2.20 upgrade on
> bugs.gentoo.org. I've tested this at home, and spoken to the bugzilla
> maintainers and it seems the issue I had earlier with the upgrade is
> easily remedied. I'
14.12.2005, 18:12:05, Georgi Georgiev wrote:
> And for the network challenged, output in local time:
And for the bandwidth/time-challenged, who do not wish to waste their time
reading useless emails:
:0:
* ^From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
/dev/null
--
Best regards,
Jakub Moc
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
On Wednesday 14 December 2005 20:00, Michael Cummings wrote:
er.. why not just do an advanced query for all bugs assigned / cc'ed to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] How that doesn't accomplish the same thing...
> Just a thought as i try to recall where i left that can of coffee,
> ~mcummings
Chris White
p
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 21:09:02 +0900 Jason Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| What's a 'PORTDIR'?
A PORTDIR is a well defined, widely used variable.
| What's a 'metadata'?
A metadata is a well defined, widely used directory in the tree.
| Outside of portage, these are also magic name voodoo.
Su
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 02:37:54AM +0900, Chris White wrote:
> er.. why not just do an advanced query for all bugs assigned / cc'ed to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] How that doesn't accomplish the same thing...
didnt know e-mail clients were integrated with bugzilla
oh, they're not, so it's still hard to
On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 06:28:04PM +0100, Jakub Moc wrote:
> 14.12.2005, 18:12:05, Georgi Georgiev wrote:
>
> > And for the network challenged, output in local time:
>
> And for the bandwidth/time-challenged, who do not wish to waste their time
> reading useless emails:
>
> :0:
> * ^From:[EMAIL
On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 02:37 +0900, Chris White wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 December 2005 20:00, Michael Cummings wrote:
>
> er.. why not just do an advanced query for all bugs assigned / cc'ed to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] How that doesn't accomplish the same thing...
Because that does nothing for filter
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 02:37:54AM +0900, Chris White wrote:
> > er.. why not just do an advanced query for all bugs assigned / cc'ed to
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] How that doesn't accomplish the same thing...
>
> didnt know e-mail clients were integrated wi
On Thu, 2005-12-15 at 02:37 +0900, Chris White wrote:
> On Wednesday 14 December 2005 20:00, Michael Cummings wrote:
>
> er.. why not just do an advanced query for all bugs assigned / cc'ed to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] How that doesn't accomplish the same thing...
>
Because i'm talking about filteri
Jakub Moc wrote:
:0:
* ^From:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
/dev/null
What a poor flame. Read through the flaming guide [1] twice, and try again.
[1] It once was http://dev.gentoo.org/~chriswhite/flame.html, where has
it gone?
--
Simon Stelling
Gentoo/AMD64 Operational Co-Lead
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
gento
On Thursday 15 December 2005 04:30, Simon Stelling wrote:
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~chriswhite/flame.html
Moved it:
http://dev.gentoo.org/~chriswhite/docs/flame.html
pgpuIK8UTgdbu.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Thu, Dec 15, 2005 at 05:27:39AM +0900, Chris White wrote:
> On Thursday 15 December 2005 04:30, Simon Stelling wrote:
> > http://dev.gentoo.org/~chriswhite/flame.html
>
> Moved it:
>
> http://dev.gentoo.org/~chriswhite/docs/flame.html
speaking of which, am i retarded, or does mod rewrite not
On Wednesday 14 December 2005 21:37, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> speaking of which, am i retarded, or does mod rewrite not work in
> .htaccess files on dev.g.o ?
I asked for that too, the feature is disabled by infra.
klieber should be the one to ask for the reasons iirc.
--
Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 20:37:06 + Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| speaking of which, am i retarded, or does mod rewrite not work in
| .htaccess files on dev.g.o ?
|
| last time i tried, i got internal server errors which usually means
| that the feature has been disabled
It's turned
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| soon. The solution to that seems simple to me. Rather than have
| 'package manager' do anything, just have it provide hooks that will
| allow you to do your thing at the times you want.
Exactly what I am doing. Hence why I'm not making Portage know any more
than it reall
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 13:48:45 -0800 Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| I wish you'd reconsider, because I was looking forward to multiple
| repository support.
Well, if Portage ever gets multiple repository support, then news
clients can be updated to handle it. The GLEP says that already.
--
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
Ok, new draft. Changes are as follows:
...
* Added emerge --ask thingie
Perhaps it would be a good idea to have an extra prompt during -av and a
forced prompt (perhaps with a timeout) for just plain old emerge. And to
make people that just don't care happy, a FEAT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 09:19:56 +0100
Harald van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 14, 2005 at 08:51:42AM +0100, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> > On Wed, 14 Dec 2005 07:59:23 +0100
> > Harald van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, De
35 matches
Mail list logo
