[gentoo-dev] Looking for jack maintainers

2005-12-08 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
Seems like the jack support in sound team started to be unavailable lately, kito is full of other tasks and he's the only one, as far as I can see, who's taking are of Jack. As I have no idea where to start looking for it, nor I have time to spend on it, unfortunately, so I can't take care of t

[gentoo-dev] Looking for DirectFB maintainers

2005-12-08 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
Another series of packages that lies around, this time for media-video team. DirectFB requires some new maintainers to take care of it and its applications. I'm not using it and seems like nobody else on the team is taking care of it, so if someone uses it, it would be good if it stepped up...

Re: [gentoo-dev] fix_libtool_files.sh enhancement needed for KDE upgrade.

2005-12-08 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 08:56:42AM +0100, Dirk Heinrichs wrote: > However, there already exists fix_libtool_files.sh, which does the same > after GCC upgrade. Could this be enhanced to also handle the KDE upgrade > case? i would say no ... re-emerge offending packages -mike -- gentoo-dev@gentoo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Looking for DirectFB maintainers

2005-12-08 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 14:19 +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: > Another series of packages that lies around, this time for media-video team. > DirectFB requires some new maintainers to take care of it and its > applications. I'm not using it and seems like nobody else on the team is > taki

Re: [gentoo-dev] Looking for DirectFB maintainers

2005-12-08 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 09:10:28AM -0500, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > On Thu, 2005-12-08 at 14:19 +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten?? wrote: > > Another series of packages that lies around, this time for media-video > > team. > > DirectFB requires some new maintainers to take care of it and its > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Looking for DirectFB maintainers

2005-12-08 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Thursday 08 December 2005 15:10, Chris Gianelloni wrote: > What are you talking about? DFBsee and at least another package is assigned to media-video, and seeing the recent assignments, I've supposed the wrong metadata , sorry ^^; -- Diego "Flameeyes" Pettenò - http://dev.gentoo.org/~flameeye

[gentoo-dev] Last rites for media-video/dvdrip

2005-12-08 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
Another package is taking a long long way that goes out of portage. I'm running out of openings for these mails, you know? Oh well, media-video/dvdrip has many issues reported in bugzilla (some have patches, most haven't), and depends on a version of transcode with many issues, too (and force us

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for media-video/dvdrip

2005-12-08 Thread Benoit Boissinot
On 12/8/05, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Another package is taking a long long way that goes out of portage. > I'm running out of openings for these mails, you know? > > Oh well, media-video/dvdrip has many issues reported in bugzilla (some have > patches, most haven't), a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for media-video/dvdrip

2005-12-08 Thread Chris Bainbridge
On 08/12/05, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Another package is taking a long long way that goes out of portage. > I'm running out of openings for these mails, you know? > > Alternative dvd-ripping software is present in portage, starting from mencoder > and its frontends, an

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for media-video/dvdrip

2005-12-08 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Thursday 08 December 2005 19:12, Chris Bainbridge wrote: > Er, isn't dvdrip the most popular ripping software on Linux? Popular, maybe, but there're enough bug to make it a difficult task to maintain. Current versions are tested only on transcode 0.6 (I'm sure that at least the versions that u

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for media-video/dvdrip

2005-12-08 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 08:46:31PM +0100, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten? wrote: > If a new maintainer is found, fine, it can remain, but currently the > resources > of Video team are limited and we have enough problems to take care of without > dvdrip. so the video herd policy is to remove packages

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for media-video/dvdrip

2005-12-08 Thread Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò
On Thursday 08 December 2005 21:10, Mike Frysinger wrote: > so the video herd policy is to remove packages until you're left with > a small enough subset of packages you can handle ? No, it's to remove the packages that have problems, that requires dependencies that are badly broken (transcode 0.6

Re: [gentoo-dev] December Council Meeting

2005-12-08 Thread Marius Mauch
On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 23:49:59 + Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > this is your [belated] reminder of the December council meeting. > future reminders will not be late anymore ... we've proven that we > cant remember it so i've gone ahead and crontab-ed future reminders > to go out on t

Re: [gentoo-dev] December Council Meeting

2005-12-08 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 09:24:57PM +0100, Marius Mauch wrote: > On Wed, 7 Dec 2005 23:49:59 + > Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > this is your [belated] reminder of the December council meeting. > > future reminders will not be late anymore ... we've proven that we > > cant remem

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for media-video/dvdrip

2005-12-08 Thread Roy Marples
On Thursday 08 December 2005 20:23, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: > On Thursday 08 December 2005 21:10, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > so the video herd policy is to remove packages until you're left with > > a small enough subset of packages you can handle ? > > No, it's to remove the packages that

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites for media-video/dvdrip

2005-12-08 Thread Chandler Carruth
I am not a gentoo developer, but a user, but I have submitted several fixes for dvdrip in the past, and plan on continuing to use it, and get it running and working in gentoo. I would be happy to maintain it, or simply try to more responsively post fixes in the future to Bugzilla if it would ke