Re: [gentoo-dev] flawfinder rats logs

2005-06-20 Thread Thierry Carrez
Rumen Yotov wrote: > Recently began using flawfinder& rats and they're working (logging things). > For now don't have time to look at the logs (beside *me* needing more > time to check them), so is there some place/person which > collects/is_interested in such info. Maybe some meta-bug or other, o

Re: [gentoo-dev] flawfinder rats logs

2005-06-20 Thread Tavis Ormandy
--On Monday, June 20, 2005 07:34:11 +0300 Rumen Yotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > Recently began using flawfinder& rats and they're working (logging > things). For now don't have time to look at the logs (beside *me* needing > more time to check them), so is there some place/person which

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: splitting one source package into many binaries

2005-06-20 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Sat, 2005-06-18 at 05:17 -0700, Duncan wrote: > > There is zero security risk unless you, as root, start the server. > > I get the point, but if it's not there to be started, it cannot be > started, thru some fat-fingering on the part of a confused admin trying to > launch the client, or any ot

Re: [gentoo-dev] linux-2.6.12

2005-06-20 Thread Chris Gianelloni
On Sat, 2005-06-18 at 09:34 -0400, Omkhar Arasaratnam wrote: > That said, we're not RedHat. We ship as MANY features as we can and let > the user decide. I agree that it is valuable to get reiser4 testing done > up front. Eventually - some people will use it. Last I checked "I think > $FOO is stupi

Re: [gentoo-dev] flawfinder rats logs

2005-06-20 Thread Rumen Yotov
Tavis Ormandy wrote: >--On Monday, June 20, 2005 07:34:11 +0300 Rumen Yotov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >wrote: > > > >>Hi, >>Recently began using flawfinder& rats and they're working (logging >>things). For now don't have time to look at the logs (beside *me* needing >>more time to check them), so is t

Re: [gentoo-dev] linux-2.6.12

2005-06-20 Thread Daniel Drake
Omkhar Arasaratnam wrote: > Sorry I was unclear - what I meant was that we wouldn't remove all > support for an fs from portage. As an example if/when reiserfs4 merges > into mainline we wouldn't be ripping out all the userland support and > vanilla-kernel support. We'd never do that. Seeing thing

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Final proposal: New alias maintainer-needed@g.o or some such (speak now or forever hold your peace ;) )

2005-06-20 Thread Maurice van der Pot
Alright, so seemant, tove, jakub and I talked about it some more on irc and it seems we've reached a consensus. This doesn't solve all problems, but it's a first step. We can talk about the next step(s) later. Two new aliases will be made that bugs can be assigned to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Use

[gentoo-dev] Language styling translation tools

2005-06-20 Thread Anthony Gorecki
I frequently work with C# applications, and rather than remaining perpetually irritated by innate class and method (et al.) naming style of the .NET framework, I'd like to either find or write a script to rewrite the class and method names automatically. Ideally, such a script would run after a

[gentoo-dev] New AT

2005-06-20 Thread Homer Parker
It is with great please I announce the newest Arch Tester, and the first non-AMD64 AT. Johannes Traub (_bambam on IRC), has become the first PPC AT. Please give him a warm welcome to the team. -- Homer Parker Gentoo/AMD64 Arch Tester Operational Lead [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- gentoo-dev@ge

[gentoo-dev] Re: New AT

2005-06-20 Thread Duncan
Homer Parker posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on Mon, 20 Jun 2005 19:41:29 -0500: > [T]he newest Arch Tester, and the first non-AMD64 AT. Johannes Traub > (_bambam on IRC), has become the first PPC AT. WOW, historic Gentoo moment! First non-amd64 AT! Very cool! (I'm studying to go

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: splitting one source package into many binaries

2005-06-20 Thread Duncan
Chris Gianelloni posted <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, excerpted below, on Mon, 20 Jun 2005 11:39:47 -0400: > On Sat, 2005-06-18 at 05:17 -0700, Duncan wrote: >> >> I get the point, but if it's not there to be started, it cannot be >> started, thru some fat-fingering on the part of a confused admin trying

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: New AT

2005-06-20 Thread Homer Parker
On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 19:03 -0700, Duncan wrote: > (I'm studying to go AT myself, but just another amd64 AT, nothing > special > like _bambam, and not yet... I get to enjoy a few more weeks of > freedom > first. ) Weeks?!?!?! ;) -- Homer Parker Gentoo/AMD64 Arch Tester Operational Lead

Re: [gentoo-dev] Language styling translation tools

2005-06-20 Thread Wesley Leggette
On Mon, 2005-06-20 at 17:00 -0700, Anthony Gorecki wrote: > I frequently work with C# applications, and rather than remaining perpetually > irritated by innate class and method (et al.) naming style of the .NET > framework, I'd like to either find or write a script to rewrite the class and > met

Re: [gentoo-dev] Language styling translation tools

2005-06-20 Thread Anthony Gorecki
On Monday, June 20, 2005 9:30 pm, Wesley Leggette wrote: > Isn't that sort of like speaking French with English words? Sorry, perhaps I should actually state what I need to do in clear terms: I need to turn MyQuiteLongClassOrMethodName() into my_quite_long_class_or_method_name() and then back aga

Re: [gentoo-dev] USE_EXPAND and IUSE

2005-06-20 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jason Stubbs wrote: > FRITZCAPI_CARDS FCDSL_CARDS VIDEO_CARDS INPUT_DEVICES LINGUAS > > Do any of these not follow the same pattern of empty var == all installed? > Any > objections to making that a requirement for adding a new USE_EXPAND variable?

Re: [gentoo-dev] USE_EXPAND and IUSE

2005-06-20 Thread Alin Nastac
Jason Stubbs wrote: >On Monday 20 June 2005 01:48, Alin Nastac wrote: > > >>net-dialup/pppconfig-2.3.11-r1 depends on LINGUAS, but the list of >>supported languages is created in pkg_unpack, based on what tarball >>contains. >> >> > >What happened to determinism and predictability? From the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: splitting one source package into many binaries

2005-06-20 Thread Donnie Berkholz
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Duncan wrote: > The 6.8.99 snapshot ebuilds > (hard masked for testing) are the CVS development snapshots of this in > portage, still unsplit, as it hasn't yet been split upstream, AFAIK. The splitting is underway. Most of the protocol headers and lib