[gentoo-dev] Re: Confirm unsubscribe from gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org

On Fri, Dec 20, 2024, at 18:29, gentoo-dev+h...@lists.gentoo.org wrote: > > > Somebody (and we hope it was you) has requested that the email address > be removed from the list. > > To confirm you want to do this, please send a message to > > which

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Confirm unsubscribe from gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org

I wish to subscribe. Proton Mail モバイルから送信 ---元のメッセージ--- 2023年7月5日 22:59 に Chris Frederick が送信: > On 7/5/23 22:58, gentoo-dev+h...@lists.gentoo.org wrote: > > > Somebody (and > we hope it was you) has requested that the email address > be removed from > the list. > > To confirm you want to do

[gentoo-dev] Re: Confirm unsubscribe from gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org

On 7/5/23 22:58, gentoo-dev+h...@lists.gentoo.org wrote: Somebody (and we hope it was you) has requested that the email address be removed from the list. To confirm you want to do this, please send a message to which can usually be done simply by replying to this message. The subject and

[gentoo-dev] Re: Confirm subscription to gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org

-- Arsen Arsenović

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Confirm unsubscribe from gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org

I'd like to remain subscribed, please. Thank you. On Tue, Dec 15, 2020, 6:23 PM Consus wrote: > > >

[gentoo-dev] Re: Confirm unsubscribe from gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org

[gentoo-dev] Re: Welcome to gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org

В письме от воскресенье, 3 ноября 2019 г. 23:01:43 +07 пользователь gentoo- dev+h...@lists.gentoo.org написал: > Thank you for confirming your subscription. You have now been added to the > normal version of the list. > > The email address you are subscribed with is . > > If you ever wish to unsu

Bouncing messages from gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org

Some messages to you could not be delivered. If you're seeing this message it means things are back to normal, and it's merely for your information. Here is the list of the bounced messages: - 89057

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Moderator ruleset for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org

On 12/20/2017 06:17 PM, Nils Freydank wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 20. Dezember 2017, 17:48:54 CET schrieb kuzetsa: >> On 12/16/2017 10:14 AM, Nils Freydank wrote: >>> Am Dienstag, 5. Dezember 2017, 23:41:45 CET schrieb kuzetsa: On 12/05/2017 05:18 PM, Nils Freydank wrote: > 5. Reasons for warnin

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Moderator ruleset for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org

On Sat, Dec 16, 2017 at 9:42 AM, Aaron W. Swenson wrote: > According to Merriam-Webster: > > self-evident > adjective | self-ev·i·dent | ˌself-ˈe-və-dənt , -ˌdent > evident without proof or reasoning > The version I used is taken from http://dd.pangyre.org/s/self-evident.html. > You have been

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Moderator ruleset for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org

On Sun, Dec 17, 2017 at 10:53 AM, Nils Freydank wrote: > There is a specific RFC about splitting the mailing list because of a > problematic style of conversation. > Well, yes - but what is problematic? Certain parties keep vaguely alluding to past actions, which is what I am inquiring about. >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Moderator ruleset for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org

Am Mittwoch, 20. Dezember 2017, 17:48:54 CET schrieb kuzetsa: > On 12/16/2017 10:14 AM, Nils Freydank wrote: > > Am Dienstag, 5. Dezember 2017, 23:41:45 CET schrieb kuzetsa: > >> On 12/05/2017 05:18 PM, Nils Freydank wrote: > >>> 5. Reasons for warnings and bans > >>> --

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Moderator ruleset for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org

On 12/16/2017 10:14 AM, Nils Freydank wrote: > Am Dienstag, 5. Dezember 2017, 23:41:45 CET schrieb kuzetsa: >> On 12/05/2017 05:18 PM, Nils Freydank wrote: >>> 5. Reasons for warnings and bans >>> >> --snip-- >> >>> c) spamming, i.e. flooding discussions with lots o

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Moderator ruleset for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org

Am Dienstag, 5. Dezember 2017, 23:41:45 CET schrieb kuzetsa: > On 12/05/2017 05:18 PM, Nils Freydank wrote: > > 5. Reasons for warnings and bans > > > > --snip-- > > > c) spamming, i.e. flooding discussions with lots of messages in a row > > d) constant postings o

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Moderator ruleset for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org

Am Freitag, 15. Dezember 2017, 17:59:59 CET schrieb Anton Molyboha: > On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 5:18 PM, Nils Freydank wrote: > > [snip] > > > > > > > > 3. Moderation > > - > > The moderation team has to consist of at least two developers. The > > moderators > > have to do join the mod

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Moderator ruleset for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org

Am Freitag, 15. Dezember 2017, 23:37:48 CET schrieb R0b0t1: > Hello, > > On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Nils Freydank wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > with regards to the current mailing list (ML) split discussion, and one > > specific message deep down there by mgorny asked for someone provi

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Moderator ruleset for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org

On 2017-12-15 16:37, R0b0t1 wrote: > Hello, > > On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Nils Freydank wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > > > with regards to the current mailing list (ML) split discussion, and one > > specific message deep down there by mgorny asked for someone providing > > moderator rules,

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Moderator ruleset for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org

Hello, On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 4:18 PM, Nils Freydank wrote: > Hello everyone, > > with regards to the current mailing list (ML) split discussion, and one > specific message deep down there by mgorny asked for someone providing > moderator rules, I would like to propose the following ruleset for g

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Moderator ruleset for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org

On Tue, Dec 5, 2017 at 5:18 PM, Nils Freydank wrote: > [snip] > > 3. Moderation > - > The moderation team has to consist of at least two developers. The > moderators > have to do join the moderation team voluntarily. > > "have to do join" should probably be "have to join" > [snip]

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Moderator ruleset for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org

On 12/05/2017 05:18 PM, Nils Freydank wrote: > 5. Reasons for warnings and bans > --snip-- > c) spamming, i.e. flooding discussions with lots of messages in a row > d) constant postings off topic, i.e. disrupting discussions with unrelated > questions > (co

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] Moderator ruleset for gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org

Hello everyone, with regards to the current mailing list (ML) split discussion, and one specific message deep down there by mgorny asked for someone providing moderator rules, I would like to propose the following ruleset for gentoo-dev Right now the situation escalated in a way that forces to

[gentoo-dev] Re: Digest of gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org issue 763 (39032-39081)

On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 06:08:34 + (UTC) gentoo-dev+h...@lists.gentoo.org wrote: > Topics (messages 39032 through 39081): > > [gentoo-dev] Re: [gentoo-dev-announce] January 2010 meeting date > 39032 - Mike Frysinger > > [gentoo-dev] Non-free software in Gentoo > 39033 - Richard Free

[gentoo-dev] Re: Digest of gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org issue 653 (33679-33728)

blah (switching emails, sorry for that) On Tue, Dec 9, 2008 at 7:14 PM, Douglas Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >

[gentoo-dev] Re: Digest of gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org issue 653 (33679-33728)

[EMAIL PROTECTED]<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

[gentoo-dev] Re: Digest of gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org issue 571 (29615-29664)

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sdfsdafsdfaf sdfdfdfdff Spanky, your date is here. -- fonts,by design, by neglect gcc-porting, for a fact or just for effect wxwindows @ gentoo EFFD 380E 047A 4B51 D2BD C64F 8AA8 8346 F9A4 0

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Digest of gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org issue 571 (29615-29664)

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: sdfsdafsdfaf sdfdfdfdff Go sparc! -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Digest of gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org issue 571 (29615-29664)

sdfsdafsdfafsdfdfdfdff