On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 15:23 +0200, Kevin F. Quinn wrote:
> SVN consumes double the bandwidth to checkout a full tree. It would
> also be interesting to find out why the server disk usage is 4x that of
> CVS (and what difference the choice of back-end makes).
I would bet that the file-system also
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 07:58:59 -0400
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please, everyone, go back and read the actual *facts* that were
> discovered using copies of *our* repositories before going around
> using data from outside sources.
Alec Warner's test results are here, of course:
On Wed, 2007-03-28 at 12:30 +0200, Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote:
> I've been reading some SCM comparisons and there are three systems which I
> think are the best
> candidates for moving to: git, mercurial and darcs. These are the three
> fastest and most capable
> SCMs. Git is still the fastest
