On Monday, March 28, 2011 08:26:00 AM Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> So after bit of smashing here and there the list of packages depending
> on media-libs/ffmpeg is stored and automatically generated on my reports
> page [1] (automatic generation is working if i didn't screw up once a day).
>
> So if you
On 03/28/2011 07:25 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> I hope my fears are unjustified but I'm not sure how the PMs would behave in
> the following cases:
>
> a deps on b and virtual/ffmpeg
> b deps on media-video/ffmpeg
>
> what happens when I want to install package 'a' on a fresh system ? the pm
>
On Wednesday, March 23, 2011 11:08:01 AM Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> Hi guys,
> As there is new ffmpeg fork that is a bit alive we should provide it as
> alternative to current media-video/ffmpeg.
>
> So libav is stored in media-video/libav (look at it, try to find issues
> and stuff).
>
> Virtual pac
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
So after bit of smashing here and there the list of packages depending
on media-libs/ffmpeg is stored and automatically generated on my reports
page [1] (automatic generation is working if i didn't screw up once a day).
So if you want to move this for
On 11:10 Wed 23 Mar , Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> > When reading about the "fork" awhile back, I assumed that ffmpeg would die
> > and libav would continue in its place. Do we really need a virtual for
> > this??
>
> might as well hedge our b
On 03/23/2011 04:17 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> And yep i think we should provide both options if they really continue
> to evolve (seems like libav is done by everyone and ffmpeg by vlc guys).
VLC is just graciously hosting the git...
lu
--
Luca Barbato
Gentoo/linux
http://dev.gentoo.org/~lu_
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dne 23.3.2011 16:01, Jeremy Olexa napsal(a):
>
> When reading about the "fork" awhile back, I assumed that ffmpeg would
> die and libav would continue in its place. Do we really need a virtual
> for this??
> -Jeremy
>
Technically it is desired, but i
On Wed, Mar 23, 2011 at 11:01 AM, Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> When reading about the "fork" awhile back, I assumed that ffmpeg would die
> and libav would continue in its place. Do we really need a virtual for
> this??
might as well hedge our bets. it'd really suck if we threw all our
eggs into libav j
On Wed, 23 Mar 2011 15:08:01 +0100, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
Hi guys,
As there is new ffmpeg fork that is a bit alive we should provide it
as
alternative to current media-video/ffmpeg.
So libav is stored in media-video/libav (look at it, try to find
issues
and stuff).
Virtual package is virtual
