Re: [gentoo-dev] reproducible builds

2018-02-04 Thread Samuel Bernardo
On 02/04/2018 06:14 PM, Canek Peláez Valdés wrote: > > > What would this even mean in the context of a source-based distro? > > > It would mean that we all could reproduce the exact same bugs given > the CFLAGS/USE/etc. combination. > > Many groups are working on this from different fronts; if

Re: [gentoo-dev] reproducible builds

2018-02-04 Thread Matthew Thode
On 18-02-04 19:20:33, Marc Schiffbauer wrote: > * Matt Turner schrieb am 04.02.18 um 19:04 Uhr: > > On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 7:25 AM, Samuel Bernardo > > wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > I send this email to know the opinion of gentoo developers about > > > registering gentoo profiles in the context of

Re: [gentoo-dev] reproducible builds

2018-02-04 Thread Marc Schiffbauer
* Matt Turner schrieb am 04.02.18 um 19:04 Uhr: > On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 7:25 AM, Samuel Bernardo > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I send this email to know the opinion of gentoo developers about > > registering gentoo profiles in the context of reproducible-builds.org > > Reproducible builds makes sense

Re: [gentoo-dev] reproducible builds

2018-02-04 Thread Canek Peláez Valdés
On Feb 4, 2018 12:04, "Matt Turner" wrote: On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 7:25 AM, Samuel Bernardo wrote: > Hi, > > I send this email to know the opinion of gentoo developers about > registering gentoo profiles in the context of reproducible-builds.org Reproducible builds makes sense when you're distri

Re: [gentoo-dev] reproducible builds

2018-02-04 Thread Matt Turner
On Sun, Feb 4, 2018 at 7:25 AM, Samuel Bernardo wrote: > Hi, > > I send this email to know the opinion of gentoo developers about > registering gentoo profiles in the context of reproducible-builds.org Reproducible builds makes sense when you're distributing binaries to users. That's not typicall