On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 6:39 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:18:20 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>> > On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:05:19 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>> >> > On
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:18:20 -0400
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:05:19 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> >> > On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 17:50:16 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
>
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 3:41 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 19:12:01 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> > On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:18:20 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> >> does it actually ? are DEPEND variables not allowed to be
>
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:17:48 -0700
Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> On 29/08/2012 15:16, Michał Górny wrote:
> >>> > > Also, some people are probably going to try to get some
> >>> > > pkgconf support directly into gcc, in form of '-something
> >>> > > libfoo' to make it grab everything magically, I t
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 19:12:01 -0400
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:18:20 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> does it actually ? are DEPEND variables not allowed to be
> >> expanded in pkg_* src_* funcs ?
> >
> > Nope. We don
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 1:12 AM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>> On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:18:20 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
>>> does it actually ? are DEPEND variables not allowed to be expanded in
>>> pkg_* src_* funcs ?
>>
>> Nope. We don't guara
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 6:37 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:18:20 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> does it actually ? are DEPEND variables not allowed to be expanded in
>> pkg_* src_* funcs ?
>
> Nope. We don't guarantee that the metadata variable gets exported back
> to the ebu
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:24:45 -0400
Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
> Ciaran only shoots at people for checking $DEPEND at inherit time. I
> think that checking $DEPEND in prune_libtool_files, which is called
> from src_install, shouldn't be a problem.
Naah, I shout at people for thinking that the fan
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:18:20 -0400
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> does it actually ? are DEPEND variables not allowed to be expanded in
> pkg_* src_* funcs ?
Nope. We don't guarantee that the metadata variable gets exported back
to the ebuild environment.
--
Ciaran McCreesh
signature.asc
Descriptio
On Thu, 2012-08-30 at 00:02 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 17:50:16 -0400
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > > In other words, pkg-config is only used when no other criteria
> > > allows it to classify the particular .la file a
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 6:14 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:05:19 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>> > On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 17:50:16 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> >> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>> >> > In
On 29/08/2012 15:16, Michał Górny wrote:
>>> > > Also, some people are probably going to try to get some pkgconf
>>> > > support directly into gcc, in form of '-something libfoo' to make
>>> > > it grab everything magically, I think.
>> >
>> > You have a future as a comedian.
> Sir, you are going
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 15:06:16 -0700
Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> On 29/08/2012 15:02, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Also, some people are probably going to try to get some pkgconf
> > support directly into gcc, in form of '-something libfoo' to make
> > it grab everything magically, I think.
>
> You hav
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 18:05:19 -0400
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 17:50:16 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> >> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> >> > In other words, pkg-config is only used when no other crite
On 29/08/2012 15:02, Michał Górny wrote:
> I'd add it to @system because a lot of packages actually need to DEPEND
> on pkgconfig because they use libraries using .pc files. And the number
> is going to increase, hopefully.
And yet it shouldn't be part of system because it's not necessary to run
a
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 17:50:16 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
>> > In other words, pkg-config is only used when no other criteria
>> > allows it to classify the particular .la file as suitable
On Wed, 29 Aug 2012 17:50:16 -0400
Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > In other words, pkg-config is only used when no other criteria
> > allows it to classify the particular .la file as suitable for
> > removal or not. Sadly, it's rather, ehm, unfrien
On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 5:42 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> In other words, pkg-config is only used when no other criteria allows
> it to classify the particular .la file as suitable for removal or not.
> Sadly, it's rather, ehm, unfriendly to ebuild developers who obviously
> don't even read the releva
18 matches
Mail list logo
