Re: [gentoo-dev] profiles/ChangeLog is too large

2011-06-10 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 09-06-2011 21:39:43 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > The profiles/ChangeLog file has grown to more than 700 kbytes. Would > it make sense to remove ancient (say, pre-2010) entries from it? Perhaps you can generalise the discussion into when you do consider a changelog entry to (still) be relevant

Re: [gentoo-dev] profiles/ChangeLog is too large

2011-06-09 Thread Michał Górny
On Thu, 9 Jun 2011 21:39:43 +0200 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > The profiles/ChangeLog file has grown to more than 700 kbytes. Would > it make sense to remove ancient (say, pre-2010) entries from it? > > Maybe it would also help if we added separate ChangeLog files for each > subdirectory? Some subdir

Re: [gentoo-dev] profiles/ChangeLog is too large

2011-06-09 Thread Matt Turner
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 3:39 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > The profiles/ChangeLog file has grown to more than 700 kbytes. Would > it make sense to remove ancient (say, pre-2010) entries from it? > > Maybe it would also help if we added separate ChangeLog files for each > subdirectory? Some subdirecto

Re: [gentoo-dev] profiles/ChangeLog is too large

2011-06-09 Thread YouTube Support
You are receiving this automated reply because you have sent mail to an invalid email address. If you are trying to contact YouTube, please visit the YouTube Help Center at: http://www.google.com/support/youtube If you're unable to find the answer to your question in the Help Center, you may use t

Re: [gentoo-dev] profiles/ChangeLog is too large

2011-06-09 Thread Markos Chandras
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 On 06/09/2011 08:39 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > The profiles/ChangeLog file has grown to more than 700 kbytes. Would > it make sense to remove ancient (say, pre-2010) entries from it? > > Maybe it would also help if we added separate ChangeLog files