On Fri, 20 May 2016 21:47:56 -0700
Matt Turner wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Daniel Campbell
> wrote:
> > To make sure I understand what you're getting at, are you saying
> > some devs get on board and then request to add keywords to packages
> > that they already maintain?
>
> No
On 05/20/2016 09:47 PM, Matt Turner wrote:
> On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
>> To make sure I understand what you're getting at, are you saying some
>> devs get on board and then request to add keywords to packages that they
>> already maintain?
>
> No, you've misundersto
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 6:36 PM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
> To make sure I understand what you're getting at, are you saying some
> devs get on board and then request to add keywords to packages that they
> already maintain?
No, you've misunderstood.
He's saying people add new packages and then sp
On Sat, May 21, 2016 at 10:09:04AM +0800, Ian Delaney wrote:
> On Fri, 20 May 2016 16:00:02 +0200
> Jeroen Roovers wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 19 May 2016 18:36:22 -0700
> > Daniel Campbell wrote:
> >
> > > To make sure I understand what you're getting at, are you saying
> > > some devs get on board a
On Fri, 20 May 2016 16:00:02 +0200
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> On Thu, 19 May 2016 18:36:22 -0700
> Daniel Campbell wrote:
>
> > To make sure I understand what you're getting at, are you saying
> > some devs get on board and then request to add keywords to packages
> > that they already maintain? I
On Thu, 19 May 2016 18:36:22 -0700
Daniel Campbell wrote:
> To make sure I understand what you're getting at, are you saying some
> devs get on board and then request to add keywords to packages that
> they already maintain? If said arches are already supported in Gentoo
> I see little problem wi
On 20/05/16 14:11, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
>
>> keywording for a new arch should normally only be done when necessary,
>> mainly if it is a direct dependency of another package. There is no need
>> to keywor it for an arch until it has been tested on that arch by some
>> user / developer ... c
On 05/20/2016 05:38 AM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 05/20/2016 03:36 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
>> On 05/19/2016 07:51 AM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
>
> ..
>
>>>
>> To make sure I understand what you're getting at, are you saying some
>> devs get on board and then request to add keywords to pac
On 05/20/2016 02:38 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
> On 05/20/2016 03:36 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
>> On 05/19/2016 07:51 AM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
>
>
> keywording for a new arch should normally only be done when necessary,
> mainly if it is a direct dependency of another package. There is
On 05/20/2016 03:36 AM, Daniel Campbell wrote:
> On 05/19/2016 07:51 AM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
..
>>
> To make sure I understand what you're getting at, are you saying some
> devs get on board and then request to add keywords to packages that they
> already maintain? If said arches are already su
On 05/19/2016 07:51 AM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> Perhaps it's a good idea to add a section to the devmanual about adding
> new keywords to packages.
>
> Recruits in particular might benefit from some background on what
> keywording means and when it should be done, especially before they
> start ma
On Thu, May 19, 2016 at 10:51 AM, Jeroen Roovers wrote:
> Perhaps it's a good idea to add a section to the devmanual about adding
> new keywords to packages.
>
> Recruits in particular might benefit from some background on what
> keywording means and when it should be done, especially before they
12 matches
Mail list logo
