Re: [gentoo-dev] musl doesn't provide execinfo.h

2020-03-28 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 10:22 AM Jaco Kroon wrote: > > Hi, > > So I figured I better write the patch for dahdi-tools against musl ... > so I proceed to download a stage3 tar from > http://distfiles.gentoo.org/experimental/amd64/musl/ (vanilla). > > I extract it, and mount --rebind /dev, /proc and

Re: [gentoo-dev] musl doesn't provide execinfo.h

2020-03-28 Thread Jaco Kroon
Hi, So I figured I better write the patch for dahdi-tools against musl ... so I proceed to download a stage3 tar from http://distfiles.gentoo.org/experimental/amd64/musl/ (vanilla). I extract it, and mount --rebind /dev, /proc and /sys, and copy in /etc/resolve.conf ... chroot ... and so far so

Re: [gentoo-dev] musl doesn't provide execinfo.h

2020-03-27 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Fri, 2020-03-27 at 19:07 -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > On 3/27/20 3:17 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > > On Fri, 2020-03-27 at 08:03 -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > > > On 3/26/20 9:25 PM, Joshua Kinard wrote: > > > > On 3/23/2020 04:21, Jaco Kroon wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > htt

Re: [gentoo-dev] musl doesn't provide execinfo.h

2020-03-27 Thread Anthony G. Basile
On 3/27/20 3:17 PM, Alexis Ballier wrote: > On Fri, 2020-03-27 at 08:03 -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote: >> On 3/26/20 9:25 PM, Joshua Kinard wrote: >>> On 3/23/2020 04:21, Jaco Kroon wrote: Hi, https://bugs.gentoo.org/713668 relates. * Searching for /usr/include/execinfo.h

Re: [gentoo-dev] musl doesn't provide execinfo.h

2020-03-27 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Fri, 2020-03-27 at 08:03 -0400, Anthony G. Basile wrote: > On 3/26/20 9:25 PM, Joshua Kinard wrote: > > On 3/23/2020 04:21, Jaco Kroon wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/713668 relates. > > > > > > * Searching for /usr/include/execinfo.h ... > > > sys-libs/glibc-2.29-r7 (/us

Re: [gentoo-dev] musl doesn't provide execinfo.h

2020-03-27 Thread Anthony G. Basile
On 3/26/20 9:25 PM, Joshua Kinard wrote: > On 3/23/2020 04:21, Jaco Kroon wrote: >> Hi, >> >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/713668 relates. >> >>  * Searching for /usr/include/execinfo.h ... >> sys-libs/glibc-2.29-r7 (/usr/include/execinfo.h) >> >> As I see I can either add an explicit depend on glibc wh

Re: [gentoo-dev] musl doesn't provide execinfo.h

2020-03-26 Thread Jaco Kroon
Hi, On 2020/03/27 03:25, Joshua Kinard wrote: > On 3/23/2020 04:21, Jaco Kroon wrote: >> Hi, >> >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/713668 relates. >> >>  * Searching for /usr/include/execinfo.h ... >> sys-libs/glibc-2.29-r7 (/usr/include/execinfo.h) >> >> As I see I can either add an explicit depend on gl

Re: [gentoo-dev] musl doesn't provide execinfo.h

2020-03-26 Thread Joshua Kinard
On 3/23/2020 04:21, Jaco Kroon wrote: > Hi, > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/713668 relates. > >  * Searching for /usr/include/execinfo.h ... > sys-libs/glibc-2.29-r7 (/usr/include/execinfo.h) > > As I see I can either add an explicit depend on glibc which I'd prefer > not to.  Or someone from the mu

Re: [gentoo-dev] musl doesn't provide execinfo.h

2020-03-23 Thread Georgy Yakovlev
On Mon, 23 Mar 2020 21:09:15 +0200 Jaco Kroon wrote: > Hi Michał, > > On 2020/03/23 18:25, Michał Górny wrote: > > > On Mon, 2020-03-23 at 10:21 +0200, Jaco Kroon wrote: > >> Hi, > >> > >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/713668 relates. > >> > >> * Searching for /usr/include/execinfo.h ... > >> sys-li

Re: [gentoo-dev] musl doesn't provide execinfo.h

2020-03-23 Thread Jaco Kroon
Hi Michał, On 2020/03/23 18:25, Michał Górny wrote: > On Mon, 2020-03-23 at 10:21 +0200, Jaco Kroon wrote: >> Hi, >> >> https://bugs.gentoo.org/713668 relates. >> >> * Searching for /usr/include/execinfo.h ... >> sys-libs/glibc-2.29-r7 (/usr/include/execinfo.h) >> >> As I see I can either add an

Re: [gentoo-dev] musl doesn't provide execinfo.h

2020-03-23 Thread Michał Górny
On Mon, 2020-03-23 at 10:21 +0200, Jaco Kroon wrote: > Hi, > > https://bugs.gentoo.org/713668 relates. > > * Searching for /usr/include/execinfo.h ... > sys-libs/glibc-2.29-r7 (/usr/include/execinfo.h) > > As I see I can either add an explicit depend on glibc which I'd prefer > not to. Or some