On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 20:37:30 +0100
Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 7:43 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Therefore, I've been slowly writing a proper GLEP that would describe
> > all of metadata.xml in detail. Here's the current draft for review:
>
> Sounds like a good idea!
>
>
On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 20:37:30 +0100
Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 7:43 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Therefore, I've been slowly writing a proper GLEP that would describe
> > all of metadata.xml in detail. Here's the current draft for review:
>
> Sounds like a good idea!
>
>
On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 7:43 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Therefore, I've been slowly writing a proper GLEP that would describe
> all of metadata.xml in detail. Here's the current draft for review:
Sounds like a good idea!
> https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/User:MGorny/GLEP:68
I reviewed your spec bas
On Fri, 18 Mar 2016 20:42:59 +0100
Johannes Huber wrote:
> Am Mittwoch 16 März 2016, 19:43:21 schrieb Michał Górny:
> > Hello, all.
> >
> > Long story short: while working on various metadata.xml-related
> > aspects, it bite us pretty hard that we lack proper spec for
> > metadata.xml file. What
Am Mittwoch 16 März 2016, 19:43:21 schrieb Michał Górny:
> Hello, all.
>
> Long story short: while working on various metadata.xml-related
> aspects, it bite us pretty hard that we lack proper spec for
> metadata.xml file. What we have is pretty much the DTD, some partial
> GLEPs (that sometimes p
