El dom, 04-03-2012 a las 15:11 +0100, Dirkjan Ochtman escribió:
> On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 14:31, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> > Only two for net-zope, but many more for, for example, sgml and
> > media-optical.
>
> We just cleaned out most of the net-zope packages. The remaining
> net-zope packages will b
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 14:31, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Only two for net-zope, but many more for, for example, sgml and
> media-optical.
We just cleaned out most of the net-zope packages. The remaining
net-zope packages will be maintained by the python team; the net-zope
herd can probably be removed.
El dom, 04-03-2012 a las 14:31 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió:
> El dom, 04-03-2012 a las 14:06 +0100, Ulrich Mueller escribió:
> > > On Sun, 04 Mar 2012, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> >
> > > Even if they have some people in their mail aliases, looks like
> > > herds are empty.
> >
> > Sorry for nitpick
El dom, 04-03-2012 a las 14:06 +0100, Ulrich Mueller escribió:
> > On Sun, 04 Mar 2012, Pacho Ramos wrote:
>
> > Even if they have some people in their mail aliases, looks like
> > herds are empty.
>
> Sorry for nitpicking, but a "herd" is a collection of packages. So the
> herds are not empt
> On Sun, 04 Mar 2012, Pacho Ramos wrote:
> Even if they have some people in their mail aliases, looks like
> herds are empty.
Sorry for nitpicking, but a "herd" is a collection of packages. So the
herds are not empty, but they have no maintainers.
> If nobody volunteers to join to them, I t
El dom, 04-03-2012 a las 13:47 +0100, Pacho Ramos escribió:
> Even if they have some people in their mail aliases, looks like herds
> are empty. If nobody volunteers to join to them, I think we should drop
> that herds and move their packages to maintainer-needed in a week or so.
>
> What do you t
