Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
>On Thu, 3 Nov 2005 16:42:51 + Tom Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>| There are currently 1066 open bugs assigned to
>| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>|
>| Could everyone please take a moment to scan through them?
>
>Here's a more useful list. It's a summary of the maintainer-wan
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
103436: net-?/nnfc-0.8.1.ebuild (New Package)
I'm can mantain this package. I'm added this :)
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Thu, 3 Nov 2005 20:40:45 +0100 Stefan Schweizer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| On 11/3/05, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| > I can also give you a list of people who throw hissy fits if you
| > dare suggest that their code may be anything less than perfect...
| > It's a pretty useful
On 11/3/05, Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can also give you a list of people who throw hissy fits if you dare
> suggest that their code may be anything less than perfect... It's a
> pretty useful starting point for filtering out the worst of the
> dross...
Do you have a list of pe
On Thu, 3 Nov 2005 16:42:51 + Tom Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| There are currently 1066 open bugs assigned to
| [EMAIL PROTECTED]
|
| Could everyone please take a moment to scan through them?
Here's a more useful list. It's a summary of the maintainer-wanted
ebuilds which are fairly un
On Thursday 03 November 2005 18:06, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> One thing I am interested would be whether or not I am allowed to add
> packages like latexmk [1] to the tree although I am not a member of the
> herd in charge of the respective category.
As long as you maintain it on your own and
On Thu, Nov 03, 2005 at 06:06:24PM +0100, Sebastian Bergmann wrote:
> Carsten Lohrke schrieb:
> > More important would be imho, if everyone would take the time and
> > have a look at the maintainer-needed bugs, instead continuously
> > adding new packages while the share of unmaintained packages
Carsten Lohrke schrieb:
> More important would be imho, if everyone would take the time and
> have a look at the maintainer-needed bugs, instead continuously
> adding new packages while the share of unmaintained packages in the
> repository grows steadily.
One thing I am interested would be w
On Thursday 03 November 2005 17:42, Tom Martin wrote:
> Could everyone please take a moment to scan through them?
More important would be imho, if everyone would take the time and have a look
at the maintainer-needed bugs, instead continuously adding new packages while
the share of unmaintained
