On 02/25/2013 12:48 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 2:21 AM, Matthew Thode
> wrote:
>> On 02/24/13 20:25, Michael Mol wrote:
>>> (I really don't have time to actively participate on this list right
>>> now, but I believe that if I bring it up on b.g.o, I'll be directed
>>> here, s
On Mon, Feb 25, 2013 at 2:21 AM, Matthew Thode
wrote:
> On 02/24/13 20:25, Michael Mol wrote:
>> (I really don't have time to actively participate on this list right
>> now, but I believe that if I bring it up on b.g.o, I'll be directed
>> here, so...)
>>
>> So I'm playing with net-fs/samba-4.0.3,
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 11:43:06PM -0800, Alec Warner wrote:
> This is incorrect, or at least, was incorrect last time I looked
> (circa...uhh..2009?)
>
> They work 'ok' together. Heimdal clients could talk to MIT servers at
> least.
and vice-versa.
> Of course, there were quirks, and incompatib
On 02/25/13 01:43, Alec Warner wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Matthew Thode
> wrote:
>> On 02/24/13 20:25, Michael Mol wrote:
>>> (I really don't have time to actively participate on this list right
>>> now, but I believe that if I bring it up on b.g.o, I'll be directed
>>> here, so...
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 11:21 PM, Matthew Thode
wrote:
> On 02/24/13 20:25, Michael Mol wrote:
>> (I really don't have time to actively participate on this list right
>> now, but I believe that if I bring it up on b.g.o, I'll be directed
>> here, so...)
>>
>> So I'm playing with net-fs/samba-4.0.3
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 09:25:37PM -0500, Michael Mol wrote:
> 2) Is it possible to slot mit-krb5 and heimdal instead of pulling them
> through a virtual? My suspicion is "no", but I don't know enough about
> kerberos to say whether or not it would work, even as a hack.
You can't eselect the kerbe
On 02/24/13 20:25, Michael Mol wrote:
> (I really don't have time to actively participate on this list right
> now, but I believe that if I bring it up on b.g.o, I'll be directed
> here, so...)
>
> So I'm playing with net-fs/samba-4.0.3, AD and kerberos, and tried to
> enable kerberos system-wide
On 02/24/2013 10:46 PM, Alec Warner wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
>> On 02/24/2013 09:48 PM, Alec Warner wrote:
>>> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
(I really don't have time to actively participate on this list right
now, but I believe
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 7:17 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
> On 02/24/2013 09:48 PM, Alec Warner wrote:
>> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
>>> (I really don't have time to actively participate on this list right
>>> now, but I believe that if I bring it up on b.g.o, I'll be directed
On 02/24/2013 09:48 PM, Alec Warner wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
>> (I really don't have time to actively participate on this list right
>> now, but I believe that if I bring it up on b.g.o, I'll be directed
>> here, so...)
>>
>> So I'm playing with net-fs/samba-4.0
On Sun, Feb 24, 2013 at 6:25 PM, Michael Mol wrote:
> (I really don't have time to actively participate on this list right
> now, but I believe that if I bring it up on b.g.o, I'll be directed
> here, so...)
>
> So I'm playing with net-fs/samba-4.0.3, AD and kerberos, and tried to
> enable kerbero
11 matches
Mail list logo
