Am Samstag, 3. März 2018, 15:39:50 CET schrieb Michał Górny:
>
> That's not a solution. That's cheap a cheap excuse that works for one
> package, for today. It does not solve the generic case, it does not mean
> that other members of toolchain or any other team will not end up having
> to remember
Hi Andreas,
"Andreas K. Huettel" writes:
> Well, in principle the idea is OK. We already/still keep some old
> glibc, gcc, and binutils versions for that reason.
>
> However, I have a few conditions.
>
> * Only masked. Only prefix keywords.
Not problem for masking. For keywords, prefix-standal
Hi Michał,
Michał Górny writes:
>> I am on the toolchain alias, and I am interested in joining the project.
>> I will be responsible to deal with all the bugs for glibc-2.16 and
>> glibc-2.19. Bug wranglers' work load does not change.
>>
>> Yes, I apologize this will generate some noise for to
W dniu sob, 03.03.2018 o godzinie 22∶51 +0900, użytkownik Benda Xu
napisał:
> Hi Michał,
>
> Michał Górny writes:
>
> > > I am sure you are aware that Prefix has two variants: one is
> > > prefix-rpath targeting MacOS, Solaris, AIX, Cygwin, Interix and a subset
> > > of GNU/Linux; the other is p
Hi Andreas,
I really appreciate your interest as I am try to convince our fellows.
"Andreas K. Huettel" writes:
> another option would be to (try to) revive glibc-2.5, 2.12, and 2.17
> instead.
> Yes I know they are even older, but these are the versions that RHEL
> uses, and for which RH stil
Hi Michał,
Michał Górny writes:
>> I am sure you are aware that Prefix has two variants: one is
>> prefix-rpath targeting MacOS, Solaris, AIX, Cygwin, Interix and a subset
>> of GNU/Linux; the other is prefix-standalone, targeting GNU/Linux and
>> Android/Linux.[1]
>>
>> For LLVM example, it is
Hi William and Alec,
Yes, I hear you.
What I want to do is not randomly throwing upstream-unmaintained package
versions into Gentoo tree. But the opposite, 1 specially maintained
glibc ebuild serving as a compatible layer will isolate the obsolete
linux kernel from the modern Gentoo tree. Syn
Am Mittwoch, 28. Februar 2018, 11:57:37 CET schrieb Andreas K. Huettel:
>
> > https://git.centos.org/summary/rpms!glibc.git
>
> 2.5 and 2.12 aren't there, but for 2.17 it looks good, this seems to be the
> complete patchset. We should be able to translate that into a gentoo branch.
... except tha
Am Mittwoch, 28. Februar 2018, 11:20:36 CET schrieb James Le Cuirot:
> On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 11:10:13 +0100
>
> "Andreas K. Huettel" wrote:
> > another option would be to (try to) revive glibc-2.5, 2.12, and 2.17
> > instead.
> >
>
> You maybe won't get the full details of the changes but all th
On Wed, 28 Feb 2018 11:10:13 +0100
"Andreas K. Huettel" wrote:
> another option would be to (try to) revive glibc-2.5, 2.12, and 2.17 instead.
>
> Yes I know they are even older, but these are the versions that RHEL uses,
> and
> for which RH still provides support (until 2020 for 2.5, 2024 fo
Am Sonntag, 25. Februar 2018, 07:17:47 CET schrieb Benda Xu:
> Hi all,
>
> Yes, it's 2018. But there are still RHEL 4 and 5 systems running
> antique kernels such as 2.6.8 and 2.6.18...
Benda,
another option would be to (try to) revive glibc-2.5, 2.12, and 2.17 instead.
Yes I know they are ev
W dniu nie, 25.02.2018 o godzinie 19∶31 +0900, użytkownik Benda Xu
napisał:
> Hi Michał,
>
> Michał Górny writes:
>
> > I don't think this is the first old version Prefix team needs keeping.
> > Another example are old versions of LLVM.
>
> I am sure you are aware that Prefix has two variants:
Am Sonntag, 25. Februar 2018, 07:17:47 CET schrieb Benda Xu:
> Hi all,
>
> Yes, it's 2018. But there are still RHEL 4 and 5 systems running
> antique kernels such as 2.6.8 and 2.6.18. In my experience, many of
> them are data acquisition hubs or computing clusters. No administrator
> cares abou
On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 12:22 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 10:10:26AM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> > W dniu nie, 25.02.2018 o godzinie 15∶17 +0900, użytkownik Benda Xu
> > napisał:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > Yes, it's 2018. But there are still RHEL 4 and 5 systems running
>
On Sun, Feb 25, 2018 at 10:10:26AM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> W dniu nie, 25.02.2018 o godzinie 15∶17 +0900, użytkownik Benda Xu
> napisał:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Yes, it's 2018. But there are still RHEL 4 and 5 systems running
> > antique kernels such as 2.6.8 and 2.6.18. In my experience, many
Hi Michał,
Michał Górny writes:
> I don't think this is the first old version Prefix team needs keeping.
> Another example are old versions of LLVM.
I am sure you are aware that Prefix has two variants: one is
prefix-rpath targeting MacOS, Solaris, AIX, Cygwin, Interix and a subset
of GNU/Linux
W dniu nie, 25.02.2018 o godzinie 18∶25 +0900, użytkownik Benda Xu
napisał:
> Hi Michał,
>
> Michał Górny writes:
>
> > > So I would like to hear what you guys think if I:
> > >
> > > - keep glibc-2.19 and glibc-2.16 in tree and unmasking them in the
> > > selected Prefix profiles;
> > >
Hi Michał,
Michał Górny writes:
>> So I would like to hear what you guys think if I:
>>
>> - keep glibc-2.19 and glibc-2.16 in tree and unmasking them in the
>> selected Prefix profiles;
>>
>> - maintain those selected outdated glibc versions on the
>> infrastructure of the To
W dniu nie, 25.02.2018 o godzinie 15∶17 +0900, użytkownik Benda Xu
napisał:
> Hi all,
>
> Yes, it's 2018. But there are still RHEL 4 and 5 systems running
> antique kernels such as 2.6.8 and 2.6.18. In my experience, many of
> them are data acquisition hubs or computing clusters. No administrat
19 matches
Mail list logo
