Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc & binutils -aware hackers wanted for questions ;)

2005-11-30 Thread Spider (D.m.D. Lj.)
On Tue, 2005-11-29 at 02:29 +0100, Spider (D.m.D. Lj.) wrote: > Hello, > I've been looking some at Michael Meeks -Bdirect patches, and the > possible performance boost they could give. > > The good parts here is that it seems to be far less intrusive for the > running system than prelink is, on

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc & binutils -aware hackers wanted for questions ;)

2005-11-28 Thread Bret Towe
On 11/28/05, Spider (D.m.D. Lj.) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 17:56 -0800, Bret Towe wrote: > > > > > > > So, now I'm just asking for comments and/or discussion here.. would it > > > be worth the time spent on this? > > > http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-10/msg00436.htm

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc & binutils -aware hackers wanted for questions ;)

2005-11-28 Thread Spider (D.m.D. Lj.)
On Mon, 2005-11-28 at 17:56 -0800, Bret Towe wrote: > > > > So, now I'm just asking for comments and/or discussion here.. would it > > be worth the time spent on this? > > http://sourceware.org/ml/binutils/2005-10/msg00436.html > > looks interesting personally id like to see how it acts on kde a

Re: [gentoo-dev] glibc & binutils -aware hackers wanted for questions ;)

2005-11-28 Thread Bret Towe
On 11/28/05, Spider (D.m.D. Lj.) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > I've been looking some at Michael Meeks -Bdirect patches, and the > possible performance boost they could give. > > The good parts here is that it seems to be far less intrusive for the > running system than prelink is, on the