On 03/15/12 at 08:11PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:28:03 +0100
> Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>
> > Seems that nobody has announced it yet:
> >
> > The gentoo-news repository has moved from subversion to git some time
> > ago. New news items should be committed to git only, beca
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
On 03/15/2012 07:49 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> On Thu, 15 Mar 2012, Rich Freeman wrote:
>
>>> The gentoo-news repository has moved from subversion to git
>>> some time ago. New news items should be committed to git only,
>>> because the master
> On Thu, 15 Mar 2012, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> The gentoo-news repository has moved from subversion to git some
>> time ago. New news items should be committed to git only, because
>> the master rsync doesn't pull from the svn repository any more.
> Is there a link to the repository anywhere?
On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 2:28 PM, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> The gentoo-news repository has moved from subversion to git some time
> ago. New news items should be committed to git only, because the
> master rsync doesn't pull from the svn repository any more.
>
Is there a link to the repository anywh
On Thu, 15 Mar 2012 19:28:03 +0100
Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> Seems that nobody has announced it yet:
>
> The gentoo-news repository has moved from subversion to git some time
> ago. New news items should be committed to git only, because the
> master rsync doesn't pull from the svn repository any
> On Thu, 8 Oct 2009, Markos Chandras wrote:
> On Thursday 08 October 2009 13:57:40 Alex Alexander wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 12:08, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>>> Some devs have complained about the directory structure in the
>>> gentoo-news being too complicated. News item files are curren
> On Thu, 08 Oct 2009, Petteri Räty wrote:
> I was planning to ask this already but now is a good time too. Last
> time we tried to remove a news item the client broke. Has the client
> since been fixed and in stable long enough to presume that most
> users have upgraded?
The news module in e
On Thu, 08 Oct 2009 15:29:25 +0300
Petteri Räty wrote:
> I was planning to ask this already but now is a good time too. Last
> time we tried to remove a news item the client broke. Has the client
> since been fixed and in stable long enough to presume that most users
> have upgraded?
No (under ce
Alex Alexander wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 14:07, Markos Chandras wrote:
>> Crowded? I don't think so :)
>> The number of news items is quite small, so I think we can afford having them
>> all in the same folder
>
> I'm assuming devs will eventually pick this feature up and use it more often
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 14:07, Markos Chandras wrote:
> Crowded? I don't think so :)
> The number of news items is quite small, so I think we can afford having them
> all in the same folder
I'm assuming devs will eventually pick this feature up and use it more often :)
But yeah, as long as someon
On Thursday 08 October 2009 13:57:40 Alex Alexander wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 12:08, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > Opinions?
>
> Sounds good, although it could get a bit crowded if we remove /,
> unless we remove really old items (like >= 2 years old).
>
Crowded? I don't think so :)
The nu
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 12:08, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> Opinions?
Sounds good, although it could get a bit crowded if we remove /,
unless we remove really old items (like >= 2 years old).
--
Alex || wired
12 matches
Mail list logo
