Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 10 April 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote:
gcc-4.3 seems to be standing up well. since the major gcc-ebuild-specific
issues seem to be resolved now, i'll probably do a sweep of bugs to see if
there's any patches i'm missing (if you guys know of a bug that should b
On Thursday 10 April 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> gcc-4.3 seems to be standing up well. since the major gcc-ebuild-specific
> issues seem to be resolved now, i'll probably do a sweep of bugs to see if
> there's any patches i'm missing (if you guys know of a bug that should be
> addressed specific
On Friday 11 April 2008, Vaeth wrote:
> > So the point is, our current 2.6.24 kernel is safe.
>
> I can *not* confirm this. Just some days ago, I compiled
> hardened-sources-2.6.24 (which uses genpatches-2.6.24-5;
> current gentoo-sources uses genpatches-2.6.24-6, but the
> difference is obviously
Vaeth wrote:
Result: Compiles fine with gcc-4.3 on x86 but dies immediately
at boot (before printing anything) unless acpi=off is used.
(And just to be sure, I disabled every acpi feature except
"general" acpi support - same result).
Please file a bug at bugs,gentoo.org, our hardened team surel
> So the point is, our current 2.6.24 kernel is safe.
I can *not* confirm this. Just some days ago, I compiled
hardened-sources-2.6.24 (which uses genpatches-2.6.24-5;
current gentoo-sources uses genpatches-2.6.24-6, but the
difference is obviously not important here [it involves
just an #include
Mike Frysinger wrote:
there is no compile time problem. it's all runtime. i still think carrying
the patch until gcc-4.3 goes stable is OK.
1400_prevent-gcc43-optimization-udivdi3.patch fixes compilation issue,
another patch (already in some 2.6.24.x, I guess) fixes direction flag
(that wel
On Thursday 10 April 2008, Jan Kundrát wrote:
> Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> > Presuming you're adding the direction-flag patch to 4.3.0 so it doesn't
> > break people on a kernel earlier than 2.6.25?
>
> gentoo-sources-2.6.24-r4 has that patch, at least when looking at the
> changelog. Or is it just f
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
Presuming you're adding the direction-flag patch to 4.3.0 so it doesn't
break people on a kernel earlier than 2.6.25?
gentoo-sources-2.6.24-r4 has that patch, at least when looking at the
changelog. Or is it just for compile-time borkage and not for the
direction flag c
On Thursday 10 April 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> Also, you'll have to provide a URL to said change. i havent seen a
> patch for it in my random driftings on the interweb.
> -mike
I was just researching the issue, so had this handy:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2008-03/msg00417.html
--
/PA
On Thursday 10 April 2008, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> On 02:57 Thu 10 Apr , Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > gcc-4.3 seems to be standing up well. since the major
> > gcc-ebuild-specific issues seem to be resolved now, i'll probably do a
> > sweep of bugs to see if there's any patches i'm missing (if y
On 02:57 Thu 10 Apr , Mike Frysinger wrote:
> gcc-4.3 seems to be standing up well. since the major gcc-ebuild-specific
> issues seem to be resolved now, i'll probably do a sweep of bugs to see if
> there's any patches i'm missing (if you guys know of a bug that should be
> addressed specif
11 matches
Mail list logo
