Re: [gentoo-dev] epatch_user usage

2012-04-24 Thread Michał Górny
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 00:25:56 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Tuesday 24 April 2012 00:15:45 Michał Górny wrote: > > On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 00:10:30 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > > On Monday 23 April 2012 23:45:36 Doug Goldstein wrote: > > > > So I've just had one reservation when using epatch_use

Re: [gentoo-dev] epatch_user usage

2012-04-23 Thread Doug Goldstein
On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Monday 23 April 2012 23:45:36 Doug Goldstein wrote: >> So I've just had one reservation when using epatch_user for allowing >> users to apply patches. And that's figuring out when to run >> eautoreconf. I don't necessarily want to run it

Re: [gentoo-dev] epatch_user usage

2012-04-23 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 24 April 2012 00:18:59 Michał Górny wrote: > It's simply better just to assume: if user wants user patches, he/she > needs to have necessary deps installed. if the package doesn't ever run autotools itself, i think this assumption is fine. set AUTOTOOLS_AUTO_DEPEND=no before inherting

Re: [gentoo-dev] epatch_user usage

2012-04-23 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 24 April 2012 00:15:45 Michał Górny wrote: > On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 00:10:30 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Monday 23 April 2012 23:45:36 Doug Goldstein wrote: > > > So I've just had one reservation when using epatch_user for allowing > > > users to apply patches. And that's figuring ou

Re: [gentoo-dev] epatch_user usage

2012-04-23 Thread Michał Górny
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 00:14:15 -0400 Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote: > On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 06:05 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > > On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 22:45:36 -0500 > > Doug Goldstein wrote: > > > > > So I've just had one reservation when using epatch_user for > > > allowing users to apply patches. A

Re: [gentoo-dev] epatch_user usage

2012-04-23 Thread Michał Górny
On Tue, 24 Apr 2012 00:10:30 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Monday 23 April 2012 23:45:36 Doug Goldstein wrote: > > So I've just had one reservation when using epatch_user for allowing > > users to apply patches. And that's figuring out when to run > > eautoreconf. I don't necessarily want to r

Re: [gentoo-dev] epatch_user usage

2012-04-23 Thread Alexandre Rostovtsev
On Tue, 2012-04-24 at 06:05 +0200, Michał Górny wrote: > On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 22:45:36 -0500 > Doug Goldstein wrote: > > > So I've just had one reservation when using epatch_user for allowing > > users to apply patches. And that's figuring out when to run > > eautoreconf. I don't necessarily want

Re: [gentoo-dev] epatch_user usage

2012-04-23 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Monday 23 April 2012 23:45:36 Doug Goldstein wrote: > So I've just had one reservation when using epatch_user for allowing > users to apply patches. And that's figuring out when to run > eautoreconf. I don't necessarily want to run it unconditionally but > sometimes users have patches which touc

Re: [gentoo-dev] epatch_user usage

2012-04-23 Thread Michał Górny
On Mon, 23 Apr 2012 22:45:36 -0500 Doug Goldstein wrote: > So I've just had one reservation when using epatch_user for allowing > users to apply patches. And that's figuring out when to run > eautoreconf. I don't necessarily want to run it unconditionally but > sometimes users have patches which

Re: [gentoo-dev] epatch_user usage

2012-04-23 Thread Arun Raghavan
On 24 April 2012 09:15, Doug Goldstein wrote: > So I've just had one reservation when using epatch_user for allowing > users to apply patches. And that's figuring out when to run > eautoreconf. I don't necessarily want to run it unconditionally but > sometimes users have patches which touch autoco