Re: [gentoo-dev] cmake-utils.eclass: two improvements

2015-08-06 Thread William Hubbs
Folks, disregard my previous msg on this thread, it was supposed to go somewhere else. William signature.asc Description: Digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] cmake-utils.eclass: two improvements

2015-08-06 Thread William Hubbs
All, as I have always said, my views can evolve with civil discussion, and there has been some good feedback on this. I also got a suggestion for handling network file systems that would mean we wouldn't have to keep track of the specific clients needed to mount network file systems; we could let

Re: [gentoo-dev] cmake-utils.eclass: two improvements

2015-07-26 Thread Andrew Savchenko
On Sun, 26 Jul 2015 17:54:52 +0600 Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov wrote: > It is bad way to just disable RPATH in eclass without any "buttons" to enable > it back. Moreover, it is bad to disable it even with such "buttons". THe > right > way would be to detect if portage instance calling eclass is in

Re: [gentoo-dev] cmake-utils.eclass: two improvements

2015-07-26 Thread Vadim A. Misbakh-Soloviov
It is bad way to just disable RPATH in eclass without any "buttons" to enable it back. Moreover, it is bad to disable it even with such "buttons". THe right way would be to detect if portage instance calling eclass is in PREFIX and depends on that — keep it or disable. -- Best regards, mva s