-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Petteri Räty wrote:
> Peter Volkov wrote:
>> Hi. How do we handle packages that provide client, server, and
>> possibly extra tools/libraries? Do we split packages like binary
>> distros do or do we use USE flags? What USE flags? Currently some
>> pack
Le 4 nov. 2009 à 20:25, Peter Volkov a écrit :
В Срд, 04/11/2009 в 17:34 +0100, Tiziano Müller пишет:
Am Mittwoch, den 04.11.2009, 18:44 +0300 schrieb Peter Volkov:
So are there any good reasons to split packages?
In environments with a staging server and binary packages, yes.
in case whe
В Срд, 04/11/2009 в 17:34 +0100, Tiziano Müller пишет:
> Am Mittwoch, den 04.11.2009, 18:44 +0300 schrieb Peter Volkov:
> > So are there any good reasons to split packages?
>
> In environments with a staging server and binary packages, yes.
Currently you either have to script your staging server
Am Mittwoch, den 04.11.2009, 18:44 +0300 schrieb Peter Volkov:
> Hi. How do we handle packages that provide client, server, and possibly
> extra tools/libraries? Do we split packages like binary distros do or do
> we use USE flags? What USE flags? Currently some packages are split
> other use clien
Peter Volkov wrote:
> Hi. How do we handle packages that provide client, server, and possibly
> extra tools/libraries? Do we split packages like binary distros do or do
> we use USE flags? What USE flags? Currently some packages are split
> other use client, server or minimal USE flag(s).
>
> Back
