On 01 Oct 2015 22:24, Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2015-10-01, o godz. 16:15:32 Mike Frysinger napisał(a):
> > On 01 Oct 2015 21:10, Michał Górny wrote:
> > > Dnia 2015-09-29, o godz. 10:21:14 Mike Frysinger napisał(a):
> > > > if your package depended on binutils because you wanted to link against
>
Dnia 2015-10-01, o godz. 16:15:32
Mike Frysinger napisał(a):
> On 01 Oct 2015 21:10, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Dnia 2015-09-29, o godz. 10:21:14 Mike Frysinger napisał(a):
> > > if your package depended on binutils because you wanted to link against
> > > libbfd or libopcodes, or you omitted the de
On 01 Oct 2015 21:10, Michał Górny wrote:
> Dnia 2015-09-29, o godz. 10:21:14 Mike Frysinger napisał(a):
> > if your package depended on binutils because you wanted to link against
> > libbfd or libopcodes, or you omitted the dep entirely (because you didn't
> > notice?), there's a new package you
Dnia 2015-09-29, o godz. 10:21:14
Mike Frysinger napisał(a):
> if your package depended on binutils because you wanted to link against
> libbfd or libopcodes, or you omitted the dep entirely (because you didn't
> notice?), there's a new package you should convert to using:
> sys-libs/binuti
On 29 Sep 2015 19:54, Andrew Savchenko wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 10:21:14 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > if your package depended on binutils because you wanted to link against
> > libbfd or libopcodes, or you omitted the dep entirely (because you didn't
> > notice?), there's a new package you
Hi,
On Tue, 29 Sep 2015 10:21:14 -0400 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> if your package depended on binutils because you wanted to link against
> libbfd or libopcodes, or you omitted the dep entirely (because you didn't
> notice?), there's a new package you should convert to using:
> sys-libs/binutil
