Re: [gentoo-dev] Unused ebuild built_with_use cleanup

2009-10-29 Thread Doug Goldstein
On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 4:51 AM, Petteri Räty wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: >> On Tuesday 27 October 2009 14:46:31 Petteri Räty wrote: >>> Normally old versions are not kept around as already said if you read >>> the thread. >> >> "normal" is not the same thing as "always".  unless you're the mai

Re: [gentoo-dev] Unused ebuild built_with_use cleanup

2009-10-28 Thread Alexis Ballier
On Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:51:34 +0200 Petteri Räty wrote: > Mike Frysinger wrote: > > On Tuesday 27 October 2009 14:46:31 Petteri Räty wrote: > >> Normally old versions are not kept around as already said if you > >> read the thread. > > > > "normal" is not the same thing as "always". unless you'r

Re: [gentoo-dev] Unused ebuild built_with_use cleanup

2009-10-28 Thread Petteri Räty
Mike Frysinger wrote: > On Tuesday 27 October 2009 14:46:31 Petteri Räty wrote: >> Normally old versions are not kept around as already said if you read >> the thread. > > "normal" is not the same thing as "always". unless you're the maintainer, > you > have no idea whether old versions are kep

Re: [gentoo-dev] Unused ebuild built_with_use cleanup

2009-10-27 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 27 October 2009 14:46:31 Petteri Räty wrote: > Normally old versions are not kept around as already said if you read > the thread. "normal" is not the same thing as "always". unless you're the maintainer, you have no idea whether old versions are kept there on purpose. ive had people

Re: [gentoo-dev] Unused ebuild built_with_use cleanup

2009-10-09 Thread Petteri Räty
Tomáš Chvátal wrote: > On čtvrtek 08 Říjen 2009, 23:34:10 Petteri Räty wrote: >> Even this is wrong because: > Hi > ... >> betelge...@pena ~ $ portageq metadata / ebuild sys-libs/glibc-2.2.5-r10 >> IUSE nls >> >> For most packages old versions are not kept around so just doing >>> =cat/foo-X.Y[us

Re: [gentoo-dev] Unused ebuild built_with_use cleanup

2009-10-09 Thread Petteri Räty
Patrick Lauer wrote: > > And that's with all the "forced" migrations for features like use-deps or the > removal of built_with_use. So unless there's some "strongly needed" features > there's no need for it. I can't remember any feature in the EAPI 3 list that > really looked useful to me, so n

Re: [gentoo-dev] Unused ebuild built_with_use cleanup

2009-10-08 Thread Patrick Lauer
On Friday 09 October 2009 00:22:26 Petteri Räty wrote: > >> across a case that couldn't be done with EAPI 2 yet. Granted the atoms > >> can be a bit cleaner with EAPI 3 but considering how much zmedico slacks > >> in implementing it, it's best to do migrating now with EAPI 2 than EAPI > > > > Comm

Re: [gentoo-dev] Unused ebuild built_with_use cleanup

2009-10-08 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
On čtvrtek 08 Říjen 2009, 23:34:10 Petteri Räty wrote: > Even this is wrong because: Hi ... > > betelge...@pena ~ $ portageq metadata / ebuild sys-libs/glibc-2.2.5-r10 > IUSE nls > > For most packages old versions are not kept around so just doing > >=cat/foo-X.Y[use] is fine and EAPI 3 is not ne

Re: [gentoo-dev] Unused ebuild built_with_use cleanup

2009-10-08 Thread Petteri Räty
Jeremy Olexa wrote: > On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Petteri Räty wrote: >> Stelian Ionescu wrote: >>> On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 16:32 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote: I wrote a script to check which ebuilds use built_with_use and have keywords in never versions making the ebuild unused. This mea

Re: [gentoo-dev] Unused ebuild built_with_use cleanup

2009-10-08 Thread Jeremy Olexa
On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 4:34 PM, Petteri Räty wrote: > Stelian Ionescu wrote: >> On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 16:32 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote: >>> I wrote a script to check which ebuilds use built_with_use and have >>> keywords in never versions making the ebuild unused. This means that >>> neither arch o

Re: [gentoo-dev] Unused ebuild built_with_use cleanup

2009-10-08 Thread Petteri Räty
Stelian Ionescu wrote: > On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 16:32 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote: >> I wrote a script to check which ebuilds use built_with_use and have >> keywords in never versions making the ebuild unused. This means that >> neither arch or ~arch users are likely to install the ebuild. The script

Re: [gentoo-dev] Unused ebuild built_with_use cleanup

2009-10-08 Thread Petteri Räty
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) wrote: > Petteri Räty wrote: >> I wrote a script to check which ebuilds use built_with_use and have >> keywords in never versions making the ebuild unused. This means that >> neither arch or ~arch users are likely to install the ebuild. The script >> and the list of ebuilds

Re: [gentoo-dev] Unused ebuild built_with_use cleanup

2009-10-07 Thread Stelian Ionescu
On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 16:32 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote: > I wrote a script to check which ebuilds use built_with_use and have > keywords in never versions making the ebuild unused. This means that > neither arch or ~arch users are likely to install the ebuild. The script > and the list of ebuilds is

Re: [gentoo-dev] Unused ebuild built_with_use cleanup

2009-10-07 Thread Marijn Schouten (hkBst)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Petteri Räty wrote: > I wrote a script to check which ebuilds use built_with_use and have > keywords in never versions making the ebuild unused. This means that > neither arch or ~arch users are likely to install the ebuild. The script > and the list o