On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 05:29:09PM +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
| On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 16:56:55 +0100 Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| wrote:
| | I'd suggest having a look at git or mercurial, they are tested on a
| | quite big workload and they seems good enough for the task.
|
| Workload isn'
On Sat, 10 Dec 2005 16:56:55 +0100 Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
| I'd suggest having a look at git or mercurial, they are tested on a
| quite big workload and they seems good enough for the task.
Workload isn't the issue. It's number of files.
--
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (I
Gcc has also moved to subversion...
On 12/10/05, Jason Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sunday 11 December 2005 00:56, Luca Barbato wrote:
> > svn so far was good but I don't know which big projects had it deployed.
>
> KDE uses subversion, depending on what you call big of course.
>
> --
> J
On Sunday 11 December 2005 00:56, Luca Barbato wrote:
> svn so far was good but I don't know which big projects had it deployed.
KDE uses subversion, depending on what you call big of course.
--
Jason Stubbs
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On 12/10/05, Luca Barbato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Kurt Lieber wrote:
>
> > CVS may not be the new, shiny kid on the block, but it's been very stable,
> > presented few problems and, in general, has served us well over the past 5+
> > years. Folks tend to point at the fancy bells and whistles
> As for moving packages by hand vs. using a tool, that's not really infra's
> call. If you were asking about CVS vs. SVN, I have been and remain
> opposed
> to using SVN for gentoo-x86 until someone can offer a whole lot of
> assurances around SVN's ability to manage a repo of our size. (1.3GB,
> As for moving packages by hand vs. using a tool, that's not really infra's
> call. If you were asking about CVS vs. SVN, I have been and remain
> opposed
> to using SVN for gentoo-x86 until someone can offer a whole lot of
> assurances around SVN's ability to manage a repo of our size. (1.3GB,
Kurt Lieber wrote:
CVS may not be the new, shiny kid on the block, but it's been very stable,
presented few problems and, in general, has served us well over the past 5+
years. Folks tend to point at the fancy bells and whistles that other
VCS offer, but they don't always stop to consider the s
On Sat, Dec 10, 2005 at 11:52:33AM + or thereabouts, Ian Leitch wrote:
> For the time being and near future, I think moves should be done by hand.
>
> What are your thoughts on this, infra?
As for moving packages by hand vs. using a tool, that's not really infra's
call. If you were asking ab
