On Thu, 20 Jun 2013 10:39:54 +0200
Fabio Erculiani wrote:
> The final outcome I would love to see is that everybody eventually
> graduates from kindergarten :-)
> And perhaps introduce a "culture-fit" score in the recruiting,
> mentoring process.
Maybe we should require everyone to be able to re
Thanks for the offer, I appreciate it, but I have to decline this time.
--
Fabio Erculiani
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/20/2013 04:39 AM, Fabio Erculiani wrote:
> The final outcome I would love to see is that everybody eventually
> graduates from kindergarten :-)
> And perhaps introduce a "culture-fit" score in the recruiting,
> mentoring process.
>
Fabio,
How
On Thu, Jun 20, 2013 at 9:32 AM, Michael Weber wrote:
>
> And it's not fair to pick on the candidates by putting them under
> close watch (mentor ship, probation already in place) and let the
> established ones walk away.
Tend to agree, and I don't think it is as productive either. Set
policies
On 06/20/2013 08:32 AM, Michael Weber wrote:
> [talking about recruiting]
>
> Please don't focus on new arrivals, we should all be under investigation.
>
> I don't know the distribution of dev-ship-duration, but (hopefully)
> it's long enough to justify a look at the stock.
>
> And it's not fair
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
[talking about recruiting]
Please don't focus on new arrivals, we should all be under investigation.
I don't know the distribution of dev-ship-duration, but (hopefully)
it's long enough to justify a look at the stock.
And it's not fair to pick on
On 20.6.2013 16.07, Matthew Thode wrote:
> On 06/20/2013 07:49 AM, Petteri Räty wrote:
>> On 20.6.2013 14.01, Matthew Thode wrote:
>>> On 06/20/2013 03:39 AM, Fabio Erculiani wrote:
The final outcome I would love to see is that everybody eventually
graduates from kindergarten :-)
And
On 06/20/2013 08:11 AM, hasufell wrote:
> On 06/20/2013 03:07 PM, Matthew Thode wrote:
>> On 06/20/2013 07:49 AM, Petteri Räty wrote:
>>> On 20.6.2013 14.01, Matthew Thode wrote:
On 06/20/2013 03:39 AM, Fabio Erculiani wrote:
> The final outcome I would love to see is that everybody
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06/20/2013 03:07 PM, Matthew Thode wrote:
> On 06/20/2013 07:49 AM, Petteri Räty wrote:
>> On 20.6.2013 14.01, Matthew Thode wrote:
>>> On 06/20/2013 03:39 AM, Fabio Erculiani wrote:
The final outcome I would love to see is that everybody
On 06/20/2013 07:49 AM, Petteri Räty wrote:
> On 20.6.2013 14.01, Matthew Thode wrote:
>> On 06/20/2013 03:39 AM, Fabio Erculiani wrote:
>>> The final outcome I would love to see is that everybody eventually
>>> graduates from kindergarten :-)
>>> And perhaps introduce a "culture-fit" score in the
On 20.6.2013 14.01, Matthew Thode wrote:
> On 06/20/2013 03:39 AM, Fabio Erculiani wrote:
>> The final outcome I would love to see is that everybody eventually
>> graduates from kindergarten :-)
>> And perhaps introduce a "culture-fit" score in the recruiting,
>> mentoring process.
>>
> As an emplo
On 06/20/2013 03:39 AM, Fabio Erculiani wrote:
> The final outcome I would love to see is that everybody eventually
> graduates from kindergarten :-)
> And perhaps introduce a "culture-fit" score in the recruiting,
> mentoring process.
>
As an employee that works for a company that requires a cult
The final outcome I would love to see is that everybody eventually
graduates from kindergarten :-)
And perhaps introduce a "culture-fit" score in the recruiting,
mentoring process.
--
Fabio Erculiani
On 20 June 2013 04:53, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> Does this mean the QA lead finally gets to suspend people who are patently
> not suited for developing a stable distribution without asking devrel?
> Because last time we got into the same judge, jury, and executioner
> argument, which I guess was
On 06/20/2013 05:53 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> Does this mean the QA lead finally gets to suspend people who are
> patently not suited for developing a stable distribution without
> asking devrel? Because last time we got into the same judge, jury,
> and executioner argument, which I guess was
On 06/19/13 18:35:49, Markos Chandras wrote:
> Hi,
>
> It is unfortunate to observe constant bullying, insults and trolling
> across our public media. Developers have been warned over and over
> that
> such behaviour is not acceptable and they should try to behave
> properly. However, people have
Does this mean the QA lead finally gets to suspend people who are patently
not suited for developing a stable distribution without asking devrel?
Because last time we got into the same judge, jury, and executioner
argument, which I guess was just sent for the gallows (pun intended).
Mind, it's not
On 06/19/2013 09:15 PM, g...@malth.us wrote:
> Sorry to hear you have such a low opinion of the socialization of Gentoo
> developers. Since I'm not one of them, I'll just put forth my 2c in on
> this, without fear of "consequences."
Yet even users not behaving will get a friendly warning and migh
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 3:15 PM, wrote:
> Am I the only one who feels that trolling, abuse, and so forth, are largely
> in the eye of the beholder, and that lively, impassioned, constructive
> debate may seem to many readers like hyperbole and ad hominem attack?
Hence my comment that this is a b
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 03:43:41PM -0400, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote:
> Gentoo developers have been resigning from the project because they got
> burned out by dealing with ad-hominems, insults, and flames. I do not see CoC
> enforcement as some sort of plot to enforce groupthink or silence debat
Gentoo developers have been resigning from the project because they got burned
out by dealing with ad-hominems, insults, and flames. I do not see CoC
enforcement as some sort of plot to enforce groupthink or silence debate, but
as an attempt to fix the real problem of burnout and talent drain.
on Wed, 19 Jun 2013, at 10:35, Markos Chandras thusly quipped:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA512
>
> Hi,
>
> It is unfortunate to observe constant bullying, insults and trolling
> across our public media. Developers have been warned over and over that
> such behaviour is not acc
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 06:35:49PM +0100, Markos Chandras wrote:
> For me, this problem is critical. Devrel is working on formalizing a new
> policy, and we will announce news on this soon. In the meantime, to
> prevent further escalations, I will use my lead powers to request
> immediate bans whe
23 matches
Mail list logo
