On Thu, 2024-10-17 at 14:12 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> The ebuilds could now depend e.g. on:
>
> >=dev-lang/pypy-3.10:=
>
> This would ensure that only slots newer than 3.10 are acceptable,
> and that packages are rebuilt (as they are right now) once we introduce
> 3.11 slot. Then, after the
Michał Górny writes:
> On Sat, 2024-10-19 at 11:42 +0100, Sam James wrote:
>> I think we should do it, but I have one question: I thought (I might be
>> misremembering though) that one reason for the existing scheme was to
>> allow easy testing of pypy versions for the same Python version outside
On Thu, Oct 17, 2024, 08:12 Michał Górny wrote:
> PyPy has basically two versions:
>
> sys.version_info
> sys.version_info(major=3, minor=10, micro=14, releaselevel='final',
> serial=0)
> sys.pypy_version_info
> sys.pypy_version_info(major=7, minor=3, micro=17, releaselevel='final',
> s
On Sat, 2024-10-19 at 11:42 +0100, Sam James wrote:
> I think we should do it, but I have one question: I thought (I might be
> misremembering though) that one reason for the existing scheme was to
> allow easy testing of pypy versions for the same Python version outside
> of packages (e.g. test tw
Michał Górny writes:
> Hello,
>
> Given that you've expressed your preference for dev-lang/python
> remaining slotted, I'd like to open another can of worms: should we slot
> PyPy consistently with it? Some history and then my ideas below.
I'm on board with this. It'd been on my mind for a whil
On Thu, 2024-10-17 at 08:47 -0400, Jérôme Carretero wrote:
> On Thu, 2024-10-17 at 14:12 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Given that you've expressed your preference for dev-lang/python
> > remaining slotted, I'd like to open another can of worms: should we
> > slot
> > PyPy consisten
On Thu, 2024-10-17 at 14:12 +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Given that you've expressed your preference for dev-lang/python
> remaining slotted, I'd like to open another can of worms: should we
> slot
> PyPy consistently with it? Some history and then my ideas below.
>
FWIW I'm all for
