Re: [gentoo-dev] Review request: Ruby 2.0 removal news item

2016-12-05 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Sun, 2016-12-04 at 09:40 +0100, Matthias Hanft wrote: > Hans de Graaff wrote: > > > > > > Ruby MRI 2.0 has been retired by upstream in February 2016.[1] > > We remove Ruby MRI 2.0 support from the tree now. Ruby MRI 2.1 > > remains > > activated in base profile's RUBY_TARGETS variable by defau

Re: [gentoo-dev] Review request: Ruby 2.0 removal news item

2016-12-05 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Sun, 2016-12-04 at 00:21 -0800, Daniel Campbell wrote: >  > 1. Do users need to know about MRI? I had to search the Web to figure > out that it's referring to Matz's Ruby Interpreter (or CRuby), which > is > the reference implementation. This information (if important) may be > useful to include

Re: [gentoo-dev] Review request: Ruby 2.0 removal news item

2016-12-04 Thread Matthias Hanft
Hans de Graaff wrote: > > Ruby MRI 2.0 has been retired by upstream in February 2016.[1] > We remove Ruby MRI 2.0 support from the tree now. Ruby MRI 2.1 remains > activated in base profile's RUBY_TARGETS variable by default. Hmmm... what about dependencies? home01 ~ # eshowkw ruby Keywords for

Re: [gentoo-dev] Review request: Ruby 2.0 removal news item

2016-12-04 Thread Daniel Campbell
On 12/03/2016 11:51 PM, Hans de Graaff wrote: > Title: Ruby 2.0 removal; Ruby 2.1 default > Author: Hans de Graaff > Content-Type: text/plain > Posted: 2016-12-04 > Revision: 1 > News-Item-Format: 1.0 > Display-If-Installed: > Ruby MRI 2.0 has been retired by upstream in February 2016.[1] > We r