Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: deprecation of baselayout-1.x

2011-07-02 Thread Rich Freeman
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 5:39 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > One thing to keep in mind when we're talking about the download of > historical binaries is the obligations of the GPL, etc, in that regard. >... > But once you start shipping historical binaries, as we're talking here, Actuall

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: deprecation of baselayout-1.x

2011-07-01 Thread Rich Freeman
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > You're very correct about portage getting confused if the existing > packages are outdated, since the tarball would be dropping in untracked > files.  At least in the past, portage wouldn't unmerge glibc or the like, > but it ce

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: rfc: deprecation of baselayout-1.x

2011-07-01 Thread Patrick Lauer
On 07/01/11 11:25, Duncan wrote: > Nirbheek Chauhan posted on Fri, 01 Jul 2011 11:26:50 +0530 as excerpted: > >> On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 11:03 AM, Dale wrote: >>> William Hubbs wrote: >>> As a user, if a person hasn't upgraded in about 6 months, they may as >>> well reinstall anyway. That is usua