Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: perl-module.eclass: respect CFLAGS, LDFLAGS - please review

2014-06-22 Thread Kent Fredric
On 23 June 2014 07:10, Kent Fredric wrote: > I'd probably go with PERL_C_BINDINGS=yes or PERL_XS=yes or similar. > > Because there's probably other things that we can infer from that property > and use for other things. > > > And its reasonably straight forward to automatically identify things

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: perl-module.eclass: respect CFLAGS, LDFLAGS - please review

2014-06-22 Thread Kent Fredric
On 23 June 2014 06:13, Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > > PERL_CFLAGS_HANDLING=yes > inherit perl-module > I'd probably go with PERL_C_BINDINGS=yes or PERL_XS=yes or similar. Because there's probably other things that we can infer from that property and use for other things. And its reasonably

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: perl-module.eclass: respect CFLAGS, LDFLAGS - please review

2014-06-22 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
Am Sonntag, 22. Juni 2014, 15:31:43 schrieb Rich Freeman: > On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Kent Fredric wrote: > > On 23 June 2014 01:02, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > >> The usual conditional for that is USE=custom-cflags or a similar variant [...] > > The problem with a USE flag here

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: perl-module.eclass: respect CFLAGS, LDFLAGS - please review

2014-06-22 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sun, Jun 22, 2014 at 9:11 AM, Kent Fredric wrote: > On 23 June 2014 01:02, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: >> >> >> The usual conditional for that is USE=custom-cflags or a similar variant >> like custom-optimization. See the firefox ebuilds, which use both. >> >> $ equery -N u firefox |

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: perl-module.eclass: respect CFLAGS, LDFLAGS - please review

2014-06-22 Thread Kent Fredric
On 23 June 2014 01:02, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > > The usual conditional for that is USE=custom-cflags or a similar variant > like custom-optimization. See the firefox ebuilds, which use both. > > $ equery -N u firefox | grep custom > - - custom-cflags: Build with user-speci