Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Things one could be upset about

2015-01-26 Thread Róbert Čerňanský
On Mon, 26 Jan 2015 09:20:30 -0500 Rich Freeman wrote: > On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 8:21 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > > The result of the current policy is that if you're waiting for the > > GLSA, unless it's _extreme_ priority (heartbleed level), on at > > least amd64, you're very oft

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Things one could be upset about

2015-01-26 Thread Rich Freeman
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 8:21 AM, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > The result of the current policy is that if you're waiting for the GLSA, > unless it's _extreme_ priority (heartbleed level), on at least amd64, > you're very often sitting there exposed for well over a week, and too > often a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Things one could be upset about

2015-01-25 Thread Róbert Čerňanský
On Sun, 25 Jan 2015 04:29:43 + (UTC) Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > Alexey Mishustin posted on Sat, 24 Jan 2015 21:54:06 +0400 as > excerpted: > > > 2015-01-20 14:42 GMT+04:00 Róbert Čerňanský : > >> > >> I somehow thought that edit the overgrowing package.use > >> file upon each emer

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Things one could be upset about

2015-01-21 Thread Róbert Čerňanský
On Wed, 21 Jan 2015 01:57:27 + (UTC) Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > Róbert Čerňanský posted on Tue, 20 Jan 2015 06:51:01 +0100 as > excerpted: > > > On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 20:51:31 + Ciaran McCreesh > > wrote: > > > >> On Mon, 19 Jan 2015 21:44:25 +0100 Róbert Čerňanský > >> wrote