On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 11:48 +0200, Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
> I found your proposal about mixing profiles awesome, and I am willing to work
> on this. In fact, I'm going to raise the issue on KDE's meeting this Thursday
> at 20:00 UTC. Any freedesktop team members will be welcome there. But I'm n
On Fri, 2010-03-12 at 16:47 +0100, Ben de Groot wrote:
>
> Even so, if we choose not to implement the split now, there are
> problems that need addressing in the current situation. The Qt team
> finds the mysql dependency that was added to the desktop profile
> three months ago (see bug #291996) u
On Friday 12 March 2010 19:39:48 Ben de Groot wrote:
> On 12 March 2010 10:48, Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
> > First of all, I'll delay the commit since I need to write documentation
> > patches, and I won't be able, as I'll leave soon for a conference and
> > will be back on Monday.
>
> What exactl
On 12 March 2010 10:48, Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
> First of all, I'll delay the commit since I need to write documentation
> patches, and I won't be able, as I'll leave soon for a conference and will be
> back on Monday.
What exactly needs to be done for documentation? Maybe I can help there.
Ch
On 12 March 2010 09:36, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> * The split desktop profile plan retroactively modifies 2008.0 and 10.0
> profiles. Not a good thing for obvious reasons.
While I agree with you in principle, this has not been Gentoo practice.
The profiles have already been modified, multiple times,
On Friday 12 March 2010 10:36:57 Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 23:20 +0100, Ben de Groot wrote:
> > On 11 March 2010 21:20, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 02:36 +0100, Ben de Groot wrote:
> > >> Seeing as there were no further comments, I think we are good to go!
>
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 23:20 +0100, Ben de Groot wrote:
> On 11 March 2010 21:20, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 02:36 +0100, Ben de Groot wrote:
> >> Seeing as there were no further comments, I think we are good to go!
> >
> > I suggest reading my comments...
>
> Unless I missed s
On 11 March 2010 21:20, Mart Raudsepp wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 02:36 +0100, Ben de Groot wrote:
>> Seeing as there were no further comments, I think we are good to go!
>
> I suggest reading my comments...
Unless I missed something, you didn't make any comments on this
thread.
If you mean t
On Thu, 2010-03-11 at 02:36 +0100, Ben de Groot wrote:
> On 8 March 2010 02:17, Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
> >
> > I attached the news item, please review. Meanwhile, I'll create docs
> > patches.
> >
> > Also, I'm CCing hardened as my No.1 question was not answered. Please do.
> > Thanks
>
> Seei
On 8 March 2010 02:17, Theo Chatzimichos wrote:
>
> I attached the news item, please review. Meanwhile, I'll create docs patches.
>
> Also, I'm CCing hardened as my No.1 question was not answered. Please do.
> Thanks
Seeing as there were no further comments, I think we are good to go!
Cheers,
--
On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 07:01:09PM +, Duncan wrote:
> Zeerak Mustafa Waseem posted on Fri, 05 Mar 2010 18:59:39 +0100 as
> excerpted:
>
> > How about the Handbook? As far as I remember you're asked to choose a
> > profile :-) I can file a bug it needs to be done :-) Just let me know
>
> That'
On Friday 05 March 2010 21:01:09 Duncan wrote:
> Zeerak Mustafa Waseem posted on Fri, 05 Mar 2010 18:59:39 +0100 as
>
> excerpted:
> > How about the Handbook? As far as I remember you're asked to choose a
> > profile :-) I can file a bug it needs to be done :-) Just let me know
>
> That's part 1
12 matches
Mail list logo
