Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: ruby-ng.eclass - new eclass for ruby-based packages

2009-12-05 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 09:57 +0100, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: > Dne středa 02 Prosinec 2009 09:51:25 Christian Faulhammer napsal(a): > > At the moment I don't remember for what reason exactly, but we renamed > > the PATCHES variable to EBZR_PATCHES in bzr.eclass. You should do > > something similar. >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: ruby-ng.eclass - new eclass for ruby-based packages

2009-12-05 Thread Hans de Graaff
On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 11:46 +0100, Fabian Groffen wrote: > I guess you better add a section for known eapis that are too old to > your liking, and use the *) section for an oops message saying you don't > know about ${EAPI} yet, and to please file a bug. Yes, good idea. We've gone with this solut

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: ruby-ng.eclass - new eclass for ruby-based packages

2009-12-02 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 02-12-2009 09:57:37 +0100, Tomáš Chvátal wrote: > Dne středa 02 Prosinec 2009 09:51:25 Christian Faulhammer napsal(a): > > At the moment I don't remember for what reason exactly, but we renamed > > the PATCHES variable to EBZR_PATCHES in bzr.eclass. You should do > > something similar. > No re

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: ruby-ng.eclass - new eclass for ruby-based packages

2009-12-02 Thread Tomáš Chvátal
Dne středa 02 Prosinec 2009 09:51:25 Christian Faulhammer napsal(a): > At the moment I don't remember for what reason exactly, but we renamed > the PATCHES variable to EBZR_PATCHES in bzr.eclass. You should do > something similar. No reason to rename it if they use base_src_prepare > > EXPORT_FU