On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 02:06:29PM +0100, Alexander Berntsen wrote
> As a long-time user, I can't put myself in a first-time user's frame
> of reference. But it would be useful for me whenever I'm installing
> Gentoo on a new device, if I were able to have the profile's USE-flags
> listed. (I know
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
On 22/01/13 13:12, Rich Freeman wrote:
As a long-time user, I can't put myself in a first-time user's frame of
reference. But it would be useful for me whenever I'm installing
Gentoo on a new device, if I were able to have the profile's USE-flags
li
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 3:03 AM, Alexander Berntsen
wrote:
>
> While I tend towards the cleaner design, not the "don't fix what isn't
> *broken*" approach -- I'm fine either way. But I think the handbook or
> some tool should obnoxiously spit the flags (and a minor
> "justification" for each flag
On Tue, Jan 22, 2013 at 2:22 AM, Ben de Groot wrote:
> On 22 January 2013 03:28, Rich Freeman wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Dustin C. Hatch
>> wrote:
>>> The package defaults have gotten out of hand, in my opinion. I use
>>> default/linux/amd64/10.0 on all my machines and my /etc/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
While I tend towards the cleaner design, not the "don't fix what isn't
*broken*" approach -- I'm fine either way. But I think the handbook or
some tool should obnoxiously spit the flags (and a minor
"justification" for each flag and/or the set of fla
On 22 January 2013 10:36, Walter Dnes wrote:
> I think we may have to admit that "one size does not fit all". There
> are just too many individual scenarios. A truly minimal build should be
> sufficient to boot to a text console, and have networking and portage to
> be able to build further up
On 22 January 2013 03:28, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Dustin C. Hatch
> wrote:
>> The package defaults have gotten out of hand, in my opinion. I use
>> default/linux/amd64/10.0 on all my machines and my /etc/portage/package.use
>> directories have dozens of -flag entr
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 02:28:47PM -0500, Rich Freeman wrote
> On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Dustin C. Hatch
> wrote:
> > The package defaults have gotten out of hand, in my opinion. I use
> > default/linux/amd64/10.0 on all my machines and my /etc/portage/package.use
> > directories have doz
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 11:51:54AM -0600, Dustin C. Hatch wrote
> The package defaults have gotten out of hand, in my opinion. I use
> default/linux/amd64/10.0 on all my machines and my
> /etc/portage/package.use directories have dozens of -flag entries for
> packages with ridiculous defaults,
On Mon, Jan 21, 2013 at 12:51 PM, Dustin C. Hatch wrote:
> The package defaults have gotten out of hand, in my opinion. I use
> default/linux/amd64/10.0 on all my machines and my /etc/portage/package.use
> directories have dozens of -flag entries for packages with ridiculous
> defaults, and almost
10 matches
Mail list logo
