On Thu, 2013-05-02 at 00:57 -0400, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote:
> On 05/01/2013 03:00 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> > On 01/05/2013 06:29, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote:
> >> I don't mean to start a flamewar here but the test suite situation is so
> >> bad with circular deps (I'm looking at y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 05/01/2013 03:00 AM, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> On 01/05/2013 06:29, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote:
>> I don't mean to start a flamewar here but the test suite situation is so
>> bad with circular deps (I'm looking at you ruby herd) and random
>>
On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 5:59 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Wed, 01 May 2013 08:00:29 +0100
> Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
>
>> On 01/05/2013 06:29, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote:
>> > I don't mean to start a flamewar here but the test suite situation is so
>> > bad with circular deps (I'm looking at you
On Wed, 01 May 2013 01:29:05 -0400
"Rick \"Zero_Chaos\" Farina" wrote:
> Sadly it is so
> bad that we have a FEATURES=test-fail-continue I can't really say
> anything negative, that fact really says it all...
My beef is not with the existence of this FEATURE but that it's enabled
in the dev
On 01/05/2013 06:29, Rick "Zero_Chaos" Farina wrote:
> I don't mean to start a flamewar here but the test suite situation is so
> bad with circular deps (I'm looking at you ruby herd) and random
> failures that I only enable tests for my own packages. Sadly it is so
> bad that we have a FEATURES=t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 04/30/2013 11:49 PM, Ryan Hill wrote:
> On Wed, 01 May 2013 11:33:00 +0800
> Patrick Lauer wrote:
>
>> On 05/01/2013 11:25 AM, Ryan Hill wrote:
>>> Since people like to start whinging threads every time we have to change
>>> flags on gcc this is a
