Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: CIA replacement

2012-10-03 Thread Rafael Goncalves Martins
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 9:21 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > Responding to no one in particular, but to the sub-thread about IRC > bots: > > On Tue, 2 Oct 2012 08:32:26 +0200 > Fabian Groffen wrote: > >> On 02-10-2012 12:40:20 +0800, Ben de Groot wrote: >> > The irker proxy was mentioned in this threa

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: CIA replacement

2012-10-02 Thread Jeroen Roovers
On Wed, 3 Oct 2012 11:43:09 +0800 Ben de Groot wrote: > I don't think any of the replacement options I've seen have this > feature. Does anyone know of something that might offer us this? Or > should we develop something in-house? AFAIK some devrel related group already has some tool running tha

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: CIA replacement

2012-10-02 Thread Ben de Groot
On 3 October 2012 08:21, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > Responding to no one in particular, but to the sub-thread about IRC > bots: > > On Tue, 2 Oct 2012 08:32:26 +0200 > Fabian Groffen wrote: > >> On 02-10-2012 12:40:20 +0800, Ben de Groot wrote: >> > The irker proxy was mentioned in this thread. I th

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: CIA replacement

2012-10-02 Thread Ben de Groot
On 3 October 2012 00:51, Peter Stuge wrote: > Ben de Groot wrote: >> > What is the source data, > > Still unanswered. I'll ask something which would be equally helpful: > > Where is the software that currently sends out emails to the -commits list? I don't know, but I assume it's a commit hook in

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: CIA replacement

2012-10-02 Thread Michael Mol
On Tue, Oct 2, 2012 at 8:21 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote: > Responding to no one in particular, but to the sub-thread about IRC > bots: > > On Tue, 2 Oct 2012 08:32:26 +0200 > Fabian Groffen wrote: > >> On 02-10-2012 12:40:20 +0800, Ben de Groot wrote: >> > The irker proxy was mentioned in this threa

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: CIA replacement

2012-10-02 Thread Anthony G. Basile
On 10/02/2012 08:21 PM, Jeroen Roovers wrote: Responding to no one in particular, but to the sub-thread about IRC bots: On Tue, 2 Oct 2012 08:32:26 +0200 Fabian Groffen wrote: On 02-10-2012 12:40:20 +0800, Ben de Groot wrote: The irker proxy was mentioned in this thread. I think we should lo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: CIA replacement

2012-10-02 Thread Jeroen Roovers
Responding to no one in particular, but to the sub-thread about IRC bots: On Tue, 2 Oct 2012 08:32:26 +0200 Fabian Groffen wrote: > On 02-10-2012 12:40:20 +0800, Ben de Groot wrote: > > The irker proxy was mentioned in this thread. I think we should look > > into this. Unless someone has a bette

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: CIA replacement

2012-10-02 Thread Peter Stuge
Ben de Groot wrote: > > What is the source data, Still unanswered. I'll ask something which would be equally helpful: Where is the software that currently sends out emails to the -commits list? > > and what does the desired output look like? > > tetromino * gentoo-x86/x11-themes/gnome-themes-

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: CIA replacement

2012-10-02 Thread Ben de Groot
On 2 October 2012 23:56, Peter Stuge wrote: > Ben de Groot wrote: >> The -commits ML is okay (tho I don't want to subscribe to such a >> high-volume ML), but we miss an IRC interface. The website and >> statistics of cia.vc were nice too. > > What is the source data, and what does the desired outp

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: CIA replacement

2012-10-02 Thread Peter Stuge
Ben de Groot wrote: > The -commits ML is okay (tho I don't want to subscribe to such a > high-volume ML), but we miss an IRC interface. The website and > statistics of cia.vc were nice too. What is the source data, and what does the desired output look like? (I mean what should the messages in ch

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: CIA replacement

2012-10-01 Thread Fabian Groffen
On 02-10-2012 12:40:20 +0800, Ben de Groot wrote: > The irker proxy was mentioned in this thread. I think we should look > into this. Unless someone has a better idea. I think it might be more beneficial to try and relay -commits email to irc. -- Fabian Groffen Gentoo on a different level sig

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: CIA replacement

2012-10-01 Thread Ben de Groot
On 1 October 2012 17:48, Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote: > Ben de Groot posted on Mon, 01 Oct 2012 16:14:25 +0800 as excerpted: > >> Since CIA.vc is dead [1], I think we should be looking into a >> replacement service, or host our own [2]. >> Is infra already looking into this? >> >> 1: http:/