On 01/27/2011 07:42 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> Only to gain the ~allarch. When it gains it gets tested by arch member
> of any team and stabled. Verstanden? :)
Yep, I think I did. But what if introduce, say, a non-portable find
command into a new revision that breaks on some arches. I'll carry ove
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dne 27.1.2011 19:09, Matti Bickel napsal(a):
> On 01/27/2011 06:59 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
>> Adding ebuilds with noarch keyword must be preceded with:
>> All ebuilds seeking to have this feature implemented must be discussed
>> on #gentoo-dev mailing
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:27:57 + (UTC)
Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> wrote:
> Tomáš Chvátal posted on Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:59:53 +0100 as excerpted:
> > If ebuild contains ~noarch in KEYWORDS it is not permitted to
> > contain anything else.
>
> /If/ we're going to go this route, at least noarch
On 01/27/2011 06:59 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> Adding ebuilds with noarch keyword must be preceded with:
> All ebuilds seeking to have this feature implemented must be discussed
> on #gentoo-dev mailing list and proven not having portability issues.
So instead of opening a bug for all arches, I po
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:59:53 +0100
Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> If depgraph is to be found broken for such architecture it is
> shadowed (or treated as without keywords, whatever we find to like in
> our implementation in package manager) and not permitted
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dne 27.1.2011 18:16, Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
> On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:07:30 +0100
> Tomáa Chvátal wrote:
>> Ok bad example on the posix-sh file. But anyway even you can check
>> what stuff the thing does and decide upon it. Anyway even tho you
>> n
On 01/27/2011 05:30 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> No, since there's no such thing as an app that's guaranteed to be
> portable.
What about app-doc/php-doc? Yeah, single use case. But I feel stupid
requesting keywords for it. It's all text.
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 18:07:30 +0100
Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> Ok bad example on the posix-sh file. But anyway even you can check
> what stuff the thing does and decide upon it. Anyway even tho you
> nitpick on something you don't need to.
> There is at mi
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ok bad example on the posix-sh file. But anyway even you can check what
stuff the thing does and decide upon it. Anyway even tho you nitpick on
something you don't need to.
There is at minimal the binary files example where you just place them
somewher
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:48:54 +0100
Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> Dne 27.1.2011 17:30, Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
> > On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 10:19:51 -0600
> > Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> >> Probably OT, sorry. Isn't it time we gained this concept of
> >> "noarch"
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 17:48:54 +0100
Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> Dne 27.1.2011 17:30, Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
> > On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 10:19:51 -0600
> > Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> >> Probably OT, sorry. Isn't it time we gained this concept of
> >> "noarch" f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dne 27.1.2011 17:30, Ciaran McCreesh napsal(a):
> On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 10:19:51 -0600
> Jeremy Olexa wrote:
>> Probably OT, sorry. Isn't it time we gained this concept of "noarch"
>> for packages that only install text files or packages that don't
>
On Thu, 27 Jan 2011 10:19:51 -0600
Jeremy Olexa wrote:
> Probably OT, sorry. Isn't it time we gained this concept of "noarch"
> for packages that only install text files or packages that don't
> compile anything...
No, since there's no such thing as an app that's guaranteed to be
portable.
--
13 matches
Mail list logo
