On Saturday 28 January 2006 12:30, Marcelo Góes wrote:
> On 1/28/06, Grobian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > The question here now actually is: "is csh worth the hassle, or not?"
> > My opinion is that it is not.
>
> csh_is_not_worth_it++;
> It is causing trouble and not adding functionality. Unless
On 1/28/06, Grobian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The question here now actually is: "is csh worth the hassle, or not?"
> My opinion is that it is not.
csh_is_not_worth_it++;
It is causing trouble and not adding functionality. Unless there are
cases where tcsh is not backwards compatible, I say it
On 28-01-2006 01:47:27 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 12:05:30PM +0300, Peter Volkov (pva) wrote:
> > To solve symlink problem I can suggest the following.
> Rather than handling it manually, perhaps eselect can help handle it
> consistently, and allow users to switch when
On 28-01-2006 09:38:05 +, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 10:31:55 +0100 Grobian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | In fact, I'd like to have only sh, because I never use bash.
>
> How did you become a Gentoo developer?
Guess I forgot to put the word 'interactively' at the end of tha
On Saturday 28 January 2006 10:47, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> Rather than handling it manually, perhaps eselect can help handle it
> consistently, and allow users to switch when they have both csh and
> tcsh installed.
I started working on something like that for gtar/bsdtar, but I found that I
don
On Sat, Jan 28, 2006 at 12:05:30PM +0300, Peter Volkov (pva) wrote:
> To solve symlink problem I can suggest the following.
Rather than handling it manually, perhaps eselect can help handle it
consistently, and allow users to switch when they have both csh and
tcsh installed.
--
Robin Hugh Johnso
On Sat, 28 Jan 2006 10:31:55 +0100 Grobian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| In fact, I'd like to have only sh, because I never use bash.
How did you become a Gentoo developer?
--
Ciaran McCreesh : Gentoo Developer (King of all Londinium)
Mail: ciaranm at gentoo.org
Web : http
On 28-01-2006 12:05:30 +0300, Peter Volkov (pva) wrote:
> On Срд, 2006-01-25 at 20:57 +0100, Grobian wrote:
> > Are there any objections to removing csh from the tree? If there are no
> > problems with csh removal before Feb 1st 2006, then I will starting from
> > that date work on getting csh rem
On Срд, 2006-01-25 at 20:57 +0100, Grobian wrote:
> Are there any objections to removing csh from the tree? If there are no
> problems with csh removal before Feb 1st 2006, then I will starting from
> that date work on getting csh removed by masking it, blocking tcsh and
> csh, and request for upd
On 25-01-2006 16:19:54 -0500, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Wednesday 25 January 2006 15:47, Stuart Herbert wrote:
> > The csh package currently has a maintainer who is an active Gentoo
> > developer; have you spoken to taviso first to find out whether he
> > wants to remove csh from the tree?
>
> la
On Wednesday 25 January 2006 15:47, Stuart Herbert wrote:
> The csh package currently has a maintainer who is an active Gentoo
> developer; have you spoken to taviso first to find out whether he
> wants to remove csh from the tree?
last we talked with taviso he had no problem punting csh
-mike
--
Hi,
On 1/25/06, Grobian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Because csh is rather old and tcsh can be used as replacement, I would
> like to have csh removed from the tree, then have tcsh always providing
> the symlink csh -> tcsh. The situation is a bit the same as Gentoo not
> providing an ebuild for
Grobian wrote:
> Problem here is that creating a conditional symlink for csh -> tcsh is a
> bit dirty, and leaves the user with a system that has no csh in case the
> csh is unmerged after tcsh was installed.
...
> Because csh is rather old and tcsh can be used as replacement, I would
> like to h
13 matches
Mail list logo
