Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: news item for sys-apps/systemd -> /usr migration

2012-01-10 Thread Donnie Berkholz
On 10:25 Fri 06 Jan , Michał Górny wrote: > On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 20:29:53 -0500 > Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote: > > I would suggest not removing the symlink unless there is a technical > > reason why its presence is undesirable. > > The symlink is distro-specific. Honestly, I'd get rid of it so

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: news item for sys-apps/systemd -> /usr migration

2012-01-06 Thread Michał Górny
On Thu, 05 Jan 2012 20:29:53 -0500 Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote: > On Fri, 2012-01-06 at 00:52 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > > 3) a symlink is installed at /bin/systemd to ensure that current > > init= specifications are still valid. > > > > Please note that these features will be removed after the

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: news item for sys-apps/systemd -> /usr migration

2012-01-05 Thread Olivier Crête
Hi, On Thu, 2012-01-05 at 20:29 -0500, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote: > Negative effects of removing the /bin/systemd symlink on 2021-05-01: an > unknown number of users who had forgotten to update their grub.conf will > discover that they can no longer boot their systems. > > I would suggest not re

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: news item for sys-apps/systemd -> /usr migration

2012-01-05 Thread Alexandre Rostovtsev
On Fri, 2012-01-06 at 00:52 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > 3) a symlink is installed at /bin/systemd to ensure that current init= > specifications are still valid. > > Please note that these features will be removed after the transitional > period and users upgrading afterwards will have to manually

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: news item for sys-apps/systemd -> /usr migration

2012-01-05 Thread Philip Webb
120106 Michał Górny wrote: > I'm going to move systemd completely to /usr soonish > and thus I'd like to submit the following news item for review. > I'd appreciate any comments and suggestions. > -- NEWS ITEM FOLLOWS -- ... > For this reason, a new revisions of all systemd versions have been